Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
A Comparison of Responses to Substantive Transition Prompts in Interviews With Children
Becky Earhart1,2, Meaghan C Danby1, Sonja P Brubacher1,2
11 School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Abstract:
This study examined children's responses to two alternate prompts used to transition to the substantive phase of an interview. Children ( N = 401) experienced four scripted events and were later interviewed. After rapport building, half of the children were asked, "Tell me what you're here to talk to me about today," whereas the other half were asked, "Tell me why you're here to talk to me today." Children's responses were coded as informative (e.g., nouns) or uninformative (e.g., "don't know"). The what prompt elicited more informative responses than the why prompt, and 7- to 9-year-olds were more informative than 5- to 6-year-olds regardless of the type of prompt they received. Given that the what prompt elicited more informative responses, the present study provides initial support for this phrasing when forensic interviewers transition to the substantive phase.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
07:01Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
Published on: March 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Phase Transitions
Phase Transitions: Vaporization and Condensation
Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing
Properties of Transition Metals
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Phase Transitions: Sublimation and Deposition