Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Isolation of Primary Myofibroblasts from Mouse and Human Colon Tissue
Published on: October 12, 2013
Podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts: a pathological hallmark of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis
Yasunori Enomoto1,2, Sayomi Matsushima1,2, Shiori Meguro1
1Department of Regenerative and Infectious Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Abstract:
Pathological differential diagnoses of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) include usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and pulmonary apical cap (PAC); however, there are no specific immunostaining makers to distinguish between these diseases. We performed immunohistochemistry using several pleural mesothelial cell-related markers, including cytokeratin-5/6, CAM5.2, WT-1, calretinin, desmin and podoplanin, for PPFE (n = 4), UIP (n = 10) and PAC (n = 3) lung sections. Among the examined markers, in PPFE and PAC lungs podoplanin commonly showed positivity for spindle cells both in thickened pleura and subpleural fibroelastosis lesions; these cells were also stained with α-smooth muscle actin, a marker of myofibroblasts. However, even in elastic fibre-rich cases, UIP lungs did not show such podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts in pleura/subpleura and fibroblastic foci. These findings were also verified using immunofluorescence. By contrast, immunohistochemically as well as morphologically, the difference between PPFE and PAC was not apparent. The presence of podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts could be a pathological hallmark of PPFE, suggesting a pathogenic process distinct from UIP but common to PAC.
Insights
Podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts may serve as a diagnostic marker for distinguishing pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) from usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). This finding suggests PPFE shares a common pathological process with pulmonary apical cap (PAC).
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary pathology
- Immunohistochemistry
- Fibroelastosis
Background:
- Distinguishing pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) from usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and pulmonary apical cap (PAC) is challenging due to overlapping pathological features.
- Currently, no specific immunostaining markers exist to differentiate these conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify specific immunostaining markers for differentiating PPFE from UIP and PAC.
- To investigate the role of pleural mesothelial cell-related markers in PPFE pathogenesis.
Main Methods:
- Immunohistochemistry was performed on lung sections from patients with PPFE (n=4), UIP (n=10), and PAC (n=3).
- Markers assessed included cytokeratin-5/6, CAM5.2, WT-1, calretinin, desmin, and podoplanin.
- Immunofluorescence was used to verify findings.
Main Results:
- Podoplanin was positive in spindle cells within thickened pleura and subpleural fibroelastosis lesions in PPFE and PAC lungs.
- These podoplanin-positive cells also stained for α-smooth muscle actin, indicating myofibroblast presence.
- UIP lungs lacked these podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts in pleural and subpleural regions.
- No significant immunohistochemical or morphological differences were observed between PPFE and PAC.
Conclusions:
- The presence of podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts may be a pathological hallmark distinguishing PPFE from UIP.
- This finding suggests a distinct pathogenic process in PPFE that is shared with PAC.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the precise role of these myofibroblasts in PPFE pathogenesis.
Related Concept Videos
Position-effect Variegation
Position and Displacement
Serial Position Effect
Position Vectors
For instance, we want to locate a point P(x, y, z) relative to the origin of coordinates O. In that case, we can define a position...
Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...
Positive, Negative, and Zero Work

