Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

407
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
407
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.5K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genomic Evidence on Antihypertensive Drug Targets and Oral Disease Outcomes.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same author

Combined periodontitis GWAS identifies LINC01541 as a regulator of innate immunity in the oral mucosa.

Human molecular genetics·2026
Same author

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and the Risk of Periodontitis Among Adults With Osteoarthritis: A Target Trial Emulation.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026
Same author

Chewing efficiency, nutritional status, and frailty in geriatric patients: a cross-sectional study.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Periodontitis and its association with left ventricular geometry and function: A cross-sectional study.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same author

FAS-controlled T cells drive lymphoproliferation through glycolysis without effector differentiation.

Journal of human immunity·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.6K

The informative error: A framework for the construction of individualized phenotypes.

Johannes Hertel1,2, Stefan Frenzel1, Johanna König1

  • 11 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|February 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a statistical framework to individualize clinical phenotypes, improving personalized medicine. It reveals how prediction errors can uncover hidden biological traits for better patient differentiation.

Keywords:
Individualizationdirected acyclic graphsindividualized medicinemeasurement errorobesitypersonalized medicineprediction modelling

More Related Videos

A Multimodal Imaging Framework to Advance Phenotyping of Living Label-free Breast Cancer Cells
10:37

A Multimodal Imaging Framework to Advance Phenotyping of Living Label-free Breast Cancer Cells

Published on: August 22, 2025

1.3K
Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
13:48

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.6K
A Multimodal Imaging Framework to Advance Phenotyping of Living Label-free Breast Cancer Cells
10:37

A Multimodal Imaging Framework to Advance Phenotyping of Living Label-free Breast Cancer Cells

Published on: August 22, 2025

1.3K
Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
13:48

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Genomics
  • Personalized Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical phenotypes are crucial for individualized medicine but often mask underlying biological heterogeneity.
  • Current phenotype definitions limit the differentiation of individuals with similar disease manifestations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a statistical framework for phenotype individualization.
  • To develop a method for deriving individualized phenotypes that capture hidden biological traits.
  • To assess the utility of individualized phenotypes in personalized medicine applications.

Main Methods:

  • Defined a statistical framework to assess variable usefulness in differentiating individuals within the same phenotype.
  • Developed a statistical workflow to derive individualized phenotypes using prediction error information.
  • Applied the framework to refine obesity definitions using data from the Study of Health in Pomerania.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that prediction error contains information about unmodeled biological traits.
  • Successfully constructed a refined, individualized definition of obesity.
  • Showcased the utility of individualized phenotypes in prospective survival analyses.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework enables the internal differentiation of individuals with the same phenotype.
  • Individualized phenotypes enhance personalized medicine by focusing on prediction error's informational content.
  • This approach refines disease definitions and improves prognostic accuracy.