Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
Published on: June 2, 2018
Robotics confers an advantage in right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis when matched against
James Chi-Yong Ngu1, Yvonne Ying-Ru Ng2
1Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, 2, Simei Street 3, Singapore, 529889, Singapore. james_ngu@cgh.com.sg.
Abstract:
Comparisons between robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy have been confounded by variations in operative technique. This study evaluates the two procedures after standardizing the intraoperative steps and perioperative management. Patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal bowel anastomosis between July 2015 and June 2017 were matched with a laparoscopic group. Perioperative management was in accordance to an enhanced recovery protocol. Outcomes and histopathological data were compared. Thirty-two patients were included. Amongst the patients who did not undergo complete mesocolic excision, the median operative time did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.413). The robotic group recorded a statistically shorter time for intracorporeal anastomosis (13 vs 19 min, p = 0.024). Postoperative recovery and complication rates were similar, except for a greater lymph node harvest in the robotic group (41 vs 31, p = 0.038). Robotic surgery achieves short-term results comparable to existing conventional laparoscopy, notwithstanding the advantages of enhanced ergonomics.
Related Concept Videos
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Enolate Mechanism Conventions
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Molecular Models

