Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Finger-stick Blood Sampling Methodology for the Determination of Exercise-induced Lymphocyte Apoptosis
Published on: February 24, 2011
Capturing incentives and avoiding penalties: The carrot and the stick
1Fort Wayne Neurological Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Fort Wayne, IN.
Healthcare costs in the US are rising unsustainably. New incentive programs from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services aim to control costs and improve care quality, but their success is uncertain.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Healthcare Economics
- Public Health
Background:
- US healthcare spending has risen unsustainably without commensurate improvements in health outcomes compared to peer nations.
- Significant legislative, regulatory, and economic shifts have occurred in response to escalating healthcare costs.
- The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has introduced four incentive-based programs to manage costs and enhance healthcare quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potential success of CMS incentive programs in controlling healthcare costs and improving quality.
- To inform healthcare providers on weighing participation costs against non-participation fines.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the impact of CMS incentive-based programs on healthcare costs and quality.
- Assessment of financial implications for healthcare providers regarding program participation.
Main Results:
- Data on the effectiveness of these new CMS programs in achieving cost containment and quality improvement goals are limited.
- Healthcare providers face potential financial penalties for non-participation, up to 10% of annual Medicare payments.
Conclusions:
- Healthcare providers must carefully consider the financial trade-offs of participating in new CMS incentive programs.
- Understanding the proportion of a practice serving Medicare and Medicaid patients is crucial for decision-making regarding program participation.
Related Concept Videos
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between...
Personality Disorders: Narcissistic and Avoidant
Characteristics of Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Narcissistic individuals exhibit an inflated sense of self-importance and an excessive need for admiration. They are often...
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Primary Motives: Sleep, Sex, and Pain Avoidance
Sleep is a fundamental physiological drive that fosters a state of restfulness crucial for several bodily functions. It facilitates body restoration, the process by which the body repairs, rejuvenates, and maintains itself during sleep, including memory...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...

