Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Dealing with Confounders in Omics Analysis
Wilson Wen Bin Goh1, Limsoon Wong2
1School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 637551, Singapore.
Abstract:
The Anna Karenina effect is a manifestation of the theory-practice gap that exists when theoretical statistics are applied on real-world data. In the course of analyzing biological data for differential features such as genes or proteins, it derives from the situation where the null hypothesis is rejected for extraneous reasons (or confounders), rather than because the alternative hypothesis is relevant to the disease phenotype. The mechanics of applying statistical tests therefore must address and resolve confounders. It is inadequate to simply rely on manipulating the P-value. We discuss three mechanistic elements (hypothesis statement construction, null distribution appropriateness, and test-statistic construction) and suggest how they can be designed to foil the Anna Karenina effect to select phenotypically relevant biological features.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Dimensional Analysis
Conversion Factors and Dimensional Analysis
The unit...
Dimensional Analysis
In fluid mechanics, dimensional...
Pedigree Analysis

