Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Arterial Pouch Microsurgical Bifurcation Aneurysm Model in the Rabbit
Published on: May 14, 2020
Treatment Strategy for STEMI With Bifurcation Culprit Lesion Undergoing Primary PCI: The COBIS II Registry
Ki Hong Choi1, Young Bin Song1, Jin-Ok Jeong2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insights
For ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with bifurcation lesions, a two-stent strategy led to higher major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to a one-stent approach. This included increased rates of target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Limited data exist on optimal treatment strategies for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with bifurcation lesions.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common treatment for STEMI, but bifurcation lesions present unique challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes between one-stent and two-stent strategies in STEMI patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing primary PCI.
- To evaluate the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the COronary BIfurcation Stenting II multicenter registry (n=2897).
- Focus on STEMI patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI (n=367), comparing one-stent (n=304) vs. two-stent (n=63) strategies.
- Inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting (IPTW) used to adjust for confounding factors; primary outcome: MACE (cardiac death, MI, target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis).
Main Results:
- Median follow-up was 38 months.
- The two-stent strategy was associated with a significantly higher rate of MACE (HR, 1.85; P = .006) compared to the one-stent strategy.
- This difference was primarily driven by increased target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis in the two-stent group.
Conclusions:
- In STEMI patients with bifurcation culprit lesions undergoing primary PCI, the two-stent strategy resulted in significantly higher MACE rates than the one-stent strategy.
- Despite successful side branch treatment, the two-stent approach showed poorer outcomes.
- Findings should be interpreted cautiously as the study reflects past practices and may not represent current treatment standards.
Introduction And Objectives:
There are limited data on the preferred treatment strategy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with bifurcation lesions. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between 1-stent and 2-stent strategies in STEMI patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
The COronary BIfurcation Stenting II is a retrospective multicenter registry of 2897 consecutive patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents from January 2003 through December 2009. Among the registered population, 367 (12.7%) patients had STEMI; of these, a 1-stent strategy was used in 304 patients and a 2-stent strategy in 63 patients; 77.1% of the patients received primary PCI with a first-generation drug-eluting stent. The inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting method was used to adjust for confounding factors. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis.
Results:
The median length of follow-up was 38 months. Postprocedural side branch diameter stenosis differed significantly between the 2 groups (1-stent vs 2-stent, 42.7% vs 9.7%; P < .001). After the performance of inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting methods, the rate of MACE was significantly higher in the 2-stent group than in the 1-stent group (HR, 1.85; 95%CI, 1.19-2.87; P = .006), mainly driven by target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.
Conclusions:
In STEMI patients with bifurcation culprit lesions undergoing primary PCI, the 2-stent strategy had significantly higher rates of MACE than the 1-stent strategy, despite successful treatment of the side branch. However, this result should be interpreted with caution because this study does not reflect current practice.
More Related Videos
08:29Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
07:21Microsurgical Creation of Giant Bifurcation Aneurysms in Rabbits for the Evaluation of Endovascular Devices
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
Persuasion Strategies
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Primary Active Transport