Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
Published on: October 28, 2025
The evolutionary impact of intragenic FliA promoters in proteobacteria
Devon M Fitzgerald1, Carol Smith2, Pascal Lapierre2
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Albany, New York, USA.
Abstract:
In Escherichia coli, one sigma factor recognizes the majority of promoters, and six 'alternative' sigma factors recognize specific subsets of promoters. The alternative sigma factor FliA (σ28 ) recognizes promoters upstream of many flagellar genes. We previously showed that most E. coli FliA binding sites are located inside genes. However, it was unclear whether these intragenic binding sites represent active promoters. Here, we construct and assay transcriptional promoter-lacZ fusions for all 52 putative FliA promoters previously identified by ChIP-seq. These experiments, coupled with integrative analysis of published genome-scale transcriptional datasets, strongly suggest that most intragenic FliA binding sites are active promoters that transcribe highly unstable RNAs. Additionally, we show that widespread intragenic FliA-dependent transcription may be a conserved phenomenon, but that specific promoters are not themselves conserved. We conclude that intragenic FliA-dependent promoters and the resulting RNAs are unlikely to have important regulatory functions. Nonetheless, one intragenic FliA promoter is broadly conserved and constrains evolution of the overlapping protein-coding gene. Thus, our data indicate that intragenic regulatory elements can influence bacterial protein evolution and suggest that the impact of intragenic regulatory sequences on genome evolution should be considered more broadly.
Related Concept Videos
What is Evolutionary History?
Bacterial Phylum Proteobacteria
Evolutionary Psychology
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region

