Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
Published on: May 31, 2021
Comparison of Basophil Activation Test and Skin Testing Performances in NMBA Allergy
Pascale Dewachter1, Sylvie Chollet-Martin2, Claudie Mouton-Faivre3
1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis Hospital Group, APHP, Paris, France & Paris 13 University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Background:
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are the main agents involved during perioperative immediate hypersensitivity. The etiological diagnosis (IgE-mediated allergy vs nonallergy) is linked to the clinical presentation together with tryptase and histamine levels and skin test results. The role of basophil activation test (BAT) needs to be better defined in this setting.
Objectives:
To assess the role of BAT compared with the results of skin testing in 31 patients experiencing immediate NMBA hypersensitivity and compare skin test results and BAT performances in the identification of alternative NMBAs.
Methods:
Histamine and tryptase levels were quantified. Anesthetic drugs, including NMBAs, were skin-tested. Basophil CD63 and CD203c expressions were measured in response to serial dilutions of the different NMBAs.
Results:
Allergy and Nonallergy groups involved 19 and 12 patients, respectively. Circulating histamine and tryptase levels were significantly increased in allergic patients. In the Allergy group, while skin test results were positive in 100% (19 of 19) of the cases, BAT positivity to the culprit NMBA reached 78.9% (15 of 19) when combining CD63 and CD203c. NMBAs cross-reactivity was identified through skin testing and BAT in 36.8% (7 of 19) and 26.3% (5 of 19) of the cases, respectively. The concordance (culprit and cross-reactive NMBAs) between skin tests and BATs was between 73.6% (14 of 19) and 100% (19 of 19) for each NMBA. Negative skin-tested NMBAs were uneventfully used in 7 NMBA-allergic patients. In the Nonallergy group, skin test results were negative in 100% of the cases while BAT result was positive once (CD63 upregulation).
Conclusion:
In our technical conditions, BAT does not replace skin testing in the assessment of NMBA allergy.
More Related Videos
10:22Basophil Activation Test for Investigation of IgE-Mediated Mechanisms in Drug Hypersensitivity
Published on: September 16, 2011
04:34Mouse Body Temperature Measurement Using Infrared Thermometer During Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis and Food Allergy Evaluation
Published on: September 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Allergic Reactions
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
Comparison between RL and RC circuits