Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
Published on: April 19, 2024
The impact of hip implant alignment on muscle and joint loading during dynamic activities
Casey A Myers1, Peter J Laz1, Kevin B Shelburne1
1Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Background:
Component alignment is an important consideration in total hip arthroplasty. The impact of changes in alignment on muscle forces and joint contact forces during dynamic tasks are not well understood, and have the potential to influence surgical decision making. The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of femoral head/stem and cup component placement on hip muscle and joint contact forces during tasks of daily living and to identify which alignment parameters have the greatest impact on joint loading.
Methods:
Using a series of strength-calibrated, subject-specific musculoskeletal models of patients performing gait, sit-to-stand and step down tasks, component alignments were perturbed and joint contact and muscle forces evaluated.
Findings:
Based on the range of alignments reported clinically, variation in head/stem anteversion-retroversion had the largest impact of any degree of freedom throughout all three tasks; average contact forces 413.5 (319.1) N during gait, 262.7 (256.4) N during sit to stand, and 572.7 (228.1) N during the step down task. The sensitivity of contact force to anteversion-retroversion of the head/stem was 31.5 N/° for gait, which was similar in magnitude to anterior-posterior position of the cup (34.6 N/m for gait). Additionally, superior-inferior cup alignment resulted in 16.4 (4.9)° of variation in the direction of the hip joint contact force across the three tasks, with the most inferior cup placements moving the force vector towards the cup equator at the point of peak joint contact force.
Interpretation:
A quantitative understanding of the impact and potential tradeoffs when altering component alignment is valuable in supporting surgical decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Impact Loading on a Cantilever Beam
When an object is dropped onto the free end of a cantilever, its potential energy due to gravity is...
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints
There are two types of cartilaginous joints:
Synchondrosis
A synchondrosis ("joined by cartilage") is a cartilaginous joint where bones are connected by hyaline cartilage. Synchondrosis may be temporary...
Joints
Structural joint classifications are based on the material that makes up the joint as well as whether or not the joint contains a space between the bones. Joints are structurally classified as fibrous, cartilaginous, or synovial.
Fibrous Joints Are Immovable
The bones of a...

