Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
Published on: May 20, 2018
A novel DNA methylation panel accurately detects colorectal cancer independently of molecular pathway
Micaela Freitas1, Fábio Ferreira1, Sónia Carvalho1,2
1Cancer Biology & Epigenetics Group-Research Center (CI-IPOP), Research Center-LAB 3, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), F Bdg, 1st Floor, Rua Dr António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Background:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most incident cancers, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and usually classified into three main molecular pathways: chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Currently, available screening methods are either costly or of limited specificity, impairing global implementation. More cost-effective strategies, including DNA methylation-based tests, might prove advantageous. Although some are already available, its performance is suboptimal, entailing the need for better candidate biomarkers. Herein, we tested whether combined use of APC, IGF2, MGMT, RASSF1A, and SEPT9 promoter methylation might accurately detect CRC irrespective of molecular subtype.
Methods:
Selected genes were validated using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 214 CRC and 50 non-malignant colorectal mucosae (CRN). Promoter methylation levels were assessed using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. MSI and CIMP status were determined. Molecular data were correlated with standard clinicopathological features. Diagnostic and prognostic performances were evaluated by receiver operator characteristics curve and survival analyses, respectively.
Results:
Except for IGF2, promoter methylation levels were significantly higher in CRC compared to CRN. A three-gene panel (MGMT, RASSF1A, SEPT9) identified malignancy with 96.6% sensitivity, 74.0% specificity and 91.5 positive predictive value (area under the curve: 0.97), independently of tumor location, stage, and molecular pathway.
Conclusions:
Combined promoter methylation analysis of MGMT/RASSF1A/SEPT9 displays a better performance than currently available epigenetic-based biomarkers for CRC, providing the basis for the development of a non-invasive assay to detect CRC irrespective of the molecular pathway.
Related Concept Videos
Wood Panel Products
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Law of Independent Assortment
DNA Topoisomerases
Types and Mechanism of action
Topoisomerases are divided into two main types. ...
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...

