Pilot and Numeric Relaying
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System IV: Auscultation
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings II: Auscultation
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
Published on: March 14, 2017
Si-Hyuck Kang1, Byunggill Joe2, Yeonyee Yoon1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic Of Korea.
This study evaluated if standard smartphones without extra hardware could accurately record and classify heart sounds. While the diagnostic software performed well, capturing clear audio directly from the chest remained difficult, suggesting current mobile microphones have limitations for reliable self-screening.
Area of Science:
Background:
Current clinical practice often overlooks traditional listening techniques due to the rise of advanced imaging modalities. No prior work had resolved whether standard mobile hardware could reliably capture heart sounds for non-expert screening. That uncertainty drove the need to investigate portable alternatives for prehospital assessment. Prior research has shown that acoustic analysis offers valuable insights into hemodynamic status. Yet, the reliance on specialized equipment limits widespread implementation in remote settings. This gap motivated an examination of consumer-grade devices for diagnostic purposes. It was already known that heart sounds contain critical physiological data. However, the technical barriers to using built-in microphones for medical-grade recordings remained poorly defined.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using smartphones for cardiac auscultation at the prehospital stage. Researchers sought to determine if standard mobile devices could function without add-on hardware. This investigation addressed the declining use of traditional listening techniques in modern clinical environments. The team focused on the potential for non-expert users to perform self-examinations before visiting a hospital. By testing consumer-grade microphones, the study explored whether portable technology could bridge the gap in cardiovascular screening. The motivation stemmed from the need for cost-effective, noninvasive tools in remote or resource-limited settings. Investigators specifically examined whether existing mobile hardware could capture sufficient data for accurate diagnosis. This work provides a foundation for understanding the limitations and capabilities of current smartphone-based diagnostic systems.
Main Methods:
Review approach involved a pilot study design to test mobile-based heart sound recording. Investigators recruited 46 participants to undergo chest wall audio capture. The team employed three distinct smartphone models for data collection. Researchers processed all recorded audio files to ensure compatibility with the classification software. A convolutional neural network served as the primary diagnostic tool for categorizing the sounds. The study evaluated diagnostic accuracy alongside sensitivity and specificity metrics. Analysts compared the performance of the three different hardware platforms. This systematic assessment aimed to determine the feasibility of using standard consumer devices for prehospital screening.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature indicate that the diagnostic algorithm achieved high accuracy across all devices. The Galaxy S5 and LG G3 both reached 90% accuracy, while the Galaxy S6 reached 87%. Sensitivity and specificity values were found to be acceptable for all three tested models. Only 30 of the 46 total recordings were classified as interpretable, representing a 65% success rate. The researchers observed that atrial fibrillation and diastolic murmurs were linked to recording failures. These specific heart conditions significantly hindered the acquisition of clear, usable audio data. The study confirms that while software classification is effective, hardware-level sound capture remains a major challenge. The data demonstrate that smartphone-based screening is technically feasible but currently limited by signal quality.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that smartphone-based heart sound analysis is a feasible concept for future screening applications. Synthesis and implications suggest that convolutional neural networks provide robust classification capabilities for recorded audio files. The researchers note that diagnostic accuracy remained high across all tested mobile models. However, the team highlights that obtaining consistent, high-quality audio recordings remains a significant hurdle. They suggest that future iterations must address the limitations of integrated microphone hardware. The study implies that while software performance is sufficient, hardware sensitivity currently restricts clinical utility. The investigators conclude that further refinement of sound acquisition techniques is required for practical implementation. These findings indicate that mobile-based diagnostics hold promise if signal quality issues are successfully mitigated.
The researchers propose that a convolutional neural network classifies heart sounds into categories. This automated process achieved 90% accuracy on the Galaxy S5 and LG G3, and 87% on the Galaxy S6, demonstrating high performance despite the challenges of raw audio acquisition.
The study utilized three specific mobile models: the Samsung Galaxy S5, the Samsung Galaxy S6, and the LG G3. These devices were chosen to test if standard, built-in microphones could capture diagnostic-quality audio without requiring any additional external hardware or attachments.
The authors state that capturing reproducible audio is a major challenge. Specifically, conditions like atrial fibrillation and diastolic murmurs were significantly associated with the failure to obtain interpretable recordings, necessitating improved signal acquisition methods for these specific clinical presentations.
The researchers employed audio file processing to prepare raw recordings for the diagnostic algorithm. This step was essential because only 30 of the 46 total recordings, or 65%, were deemed interpretable by the system, highlighting the variability in data quality.
The study measured diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. These metrics were used to evaluate the performance of the classification algorithm across the different smartphone models, confirming that the software outputs were acceptable for clinical screening.
The authors claim that while the software successfully discriminates between heart sounds, the hardware limitations of current microphones prevent reliable, widespread clinical use. They propose that future efforts should focus on overcoming these acquisition barriers to make self-examination a reality.