Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Tracking the follow-up of work in progress papers
Omar Mubin1, Mudassar Arsalan2, Abdullah Al Mahmud3
11Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Work in progress papers in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) conferences are often not extended into full papers. Analysis of self-citation patterns reveals that nearly half of these preliminary research submissions are not cited later, questioning their long-term impact.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
- Scholarly Communication Analysis
Background:
- Academic conferences feature diverse tracks, including Work in Progress (WIP) papers, which present preliminary findings.
- WIP papers in HCI are increasingly popular due to higher acceptance rates compared to main conference tracks.
- The academic trajectory of WIP papers—whether they evolve into full publications or remain standalone—is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the extent to which Work in Progress papers in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) are further developed into full research publications.
- To analyze self-citation patterns as an indicator of the continuation and impact of WIP papers.
- To identify trends in the publication venues and timing of extended WIP research.
Main Methods:
- Examination of self-citation patterns across four Work in Progress (WIP) paper editions from two major HCI conferences (CHI and HRI) between 2010 and 2011.
- Analysis of citation data to determine the proportion of WIP papers that are cited in subsequent publications.
- Tracing author publication records to explore reasons for the lack of self-citation in follow-up work.
Main Results:
- Approximately 50% of Work in Progress (WIP) papers exhibit no self-citations.
- Only about half of the observed self-citations represent genuine extensions of the original WIP research.
- Specific conferences are identified as preferred venues for publishing extended WIP research, with citation frequency peaking in the year following initial publication.
Conclusions:
- A significant portion of Work in Progress (WIP) papers in HCI do not appear to transition into more comprehensive full papers.
- The findings suggest a need to re-evaluate the role and impact of WIP tracks in premier HCI conferences.
- Understanding citation patterns provides insights into the long-term scholarly contribution of preliminary research presented at conferences.
Related Concept Videos
Quantifying Work
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
Work Done During Volume Change
Consider a gas confined to a cylinder fitted with a movable piston at one end. If the gas expands from volume V1 to volume V2, it exerts a force on the piston, such that the piston moves by a distance dr.
The work done by the gas on the piston can be expressed as

