Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Imaging Features of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Published on: June 16, 2020
Quantitative computed tomography applied to interstitial lung diseases
Martin Obert1, Marian Kampschulte1, Rebekka Limburg1
1Department of Radiology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany Members of The German Center for Lung Research (DZL e. V.).
Objectives:
To evaluate a new image marker that retrieves information from computed tomography (CT) density histograms, with respect to classification properties between different lung parenchyma groups. Furthermore, to conduct a comparison of the new image marker with conventional markers.
Materials And Methods:
Density histograms from 220 different subjects (normal = 71; emphysema = 73; fibrotic = 76) were used to compare the conventionally applied emphysema index (EI), 15th percentile value (PV), mean value (MV), variance (V), skewness (S), kurtosis (K), with a new histogram's functional shape (HFS) method. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) analyses was performed to calculate predictions of different lung parenchyma group membership using the individual methods, as well as combinations thereof, as covariates. Overall correct assigned subjects (OCA), sensitivity (sens), specificity (spec), and Nagelkerke's pseudo R2 (NR2) effect size were estimated. NR2 was used to set up a ranking list of the different methods.
Results:
MLR indicates the highest classification power (OCA of 92%; sens 0.95; spec 0.89; NR2 0.95) when all histogram analyses methods were applied together in the MLR. Highest classification power among individually applied methods was found using the HFS concept (OCA 86%; sens 0.93; spec 0.79; NR2 0.80). Conventional methods achieved lower classification potential on their own: EI (OCA 69%; sens 0.95; spec 0.26; NR2 0.52); PV (OCA 69%; sens 0.90; spec 0.37; NR2 0.57); MV (OCA 65%; sens 0.71; spec 0.58; NR2 0.61); V (OCA 66%; sens 0.72; spec 0.53; NR2 0.66); S (OCA 65%; sens 0.88; spec 0.26; NR2 0.55); and K (OCA 63%; sens 0.90; spec 0.16; NR2 0.48).
Conclusion:
The HFS method, which was so far applied to a CT bone density curve analysis, is also a remarkable information extraction tool for lung density histograms. Presumably, being a principle mathematical approach, the HFS method can extract valuable health related information also from histograms from complete different areas.
More Related Videos
06:31Author Spotlight: Enhancing Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Through HR-pQCT Imaging Analysis
Published on: October 6, 2023
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Lung Capacity
Substitution Rule Applied to Indefinite Integrals
Substitution Rule Applied to Definite Integrals
Design Example: Traverse Angle Computations