Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
Genome-wide genotype-based risk model for survival in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients
Silvia Park1, Hangseok Choi2, Hee Je Kim3
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea.
Abstract:
The present study attempted to build a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based risk model for predicting overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML). Adopting genome-wide SNP array using Affymetrix SNP array 6.0, we analyzed 868,157 SNPs with respect to OS and EFS in 104 patients with CBF-AML. Significant SNPs were identified from single SNP analysis. The risk model was constructed with incorporation of six SNPs and three clinical factors (age, c-kit exon 17 mutation, and LDH) for OS and six SNPs and three clinical factors (age, WBC, and LDH) for EFS. The model was further defined into low- and high-risk groups based on risk scores. The median age was 39 years, and the subgroup of t(8;21) and inv(16) or t(16;16) was assessed in 68 (65.4%) and 36 patients (34.6%). Finally, six SNPs per each OS (rs4353685, rs4908185, rs7709207, rs12034, rs1554844, and rs17241868) and EFS (rs13385610, rs11210617, rs11169282, rs7709207, rs4438401, and rs16894846) were incorporated into the risk model. OS was significantly different in favor of the low risk group (80.4 ± 8.4%) compared to the high-risk group (22.0 ± 7.3% at 3 years; p = 8.75 × 10- 13; HR 8.67). For EFS, there was also a significant difference between the low- (75.0 ± 5.8%) versus high-risk group (17.1 ± 6.3% at 3 years; p = 5.95 × 10- 13; HR 7.67). A genome-wide SNP-based risk model can stratify CBF-AML patients according to their OS and EFS in 104 patients.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Patient-Related Factors
Age stands as a key determinant in protein-drug binding. Neonates, characterized by low albumin content, experience heightened concentrations of unbound drugs such as phenytoin and...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors
One crucial factor in drug-protein binding is the drug's lipophilicity or its affinity for fat. More lipophilic drugs tend to have higher binding extents. For example, highly lipophilic drugs like cloxacillin exhibit substantial protein binding, with as much as 95% of the drug binding to proteins. In...

