Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.3K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
Benefits of Self-Esteem01:25

Benefits of Self-Esteem

215
Self-esteem—an individual's overall evaluation of their worth—plays a complex role in psychological functioning and well-being. It is often associated with many positive traits, such as confidence, optimism, and perseverance. Individuals with high self-esteem typically experience better sleep, manage peer pressure more effectively, and report greater life satisfaction. Conversely, low self-esteem has been consistently linked with increased risks of depression, anxiety, and poor...
215
The Periodic Table03:25

The Periodic Table

119.7K
As early chemists discovered more elements, they realized that various elements could be grouped by their similar chemical behaviors. One such grouping includes lithium (Li), sodium (Na), and potassium (K). All of these elements are shiny, conduct heat and electricity well, and have similar chemical properties. A second grouping includes calcium (Ca), strontium (Sr), and barium (Ba), which also are shiny, good conductors of heat and electricity, and have chemical properties in common. However,...
119.7K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

29.6K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
29.6K
Periodic Classification of the Elements04:00

Periodic Classification of the Elements

60.2K
The periodic table arranges atoms based on increasing atomic number so that elements with the same chemical properties recur periodically. When their electron configurations are added to the table, a periodic recurrence of similar electron configurations in the outer shells of these elements is observed. Because they are in the outer shells of an atom, valence electrons play the most important role in chemical reactions. The outer electrons have the highest energy of the electrons in an atom...
60.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Photonic implementation of a switchable dual-channel single-sideband mixer without optical filters.

Applied optics·2026
Same author

Surface engineering and local electron structure modulation to accelerate electroreduction of low-concentration nitrate.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

IGF2BP3 promotes gastric cancer progression by inhibiting ferroptosis through ETV4-mediated regulation of GCH1.

Cancer biology & therapy·2026
Same author

Rational Design of Capsid Protein VP1 Degraders to Overcome Pleconaril Resistance in Inhibiting Enterovirus D68.

JACS Au·2026
Same author

Coordinated immune response distinguishes duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral particle shedding in humans.

iScience·2026
Same author

Advantages of Combined Multiple-Case Teaching and Narrative Medicine Teaching Methods in Orthognathic Surgery.

International dental journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro
06:22

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro

Published on: August 28, 2019

5.6K

Periodic benefit-risk assessment using Bayesian stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis.

Kan Li1, Shuai Sammy Yuan2, William Wang2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Contemporary Clinical Trials
|March 6, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Benefit-risk (BR) assessment helps optimize medical product decisions. This study introduces a statistical framework combining Bayesian meta-analysis and stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) for dynamic, evidence-based evaluations.

Keywords:
Bayesian meta-analysisClinical trialsMulti-criteria decision analysisPeriodic benefit-risk evaluation reportStochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysisStructured benefit-risk assessment

More Related Videos

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.1K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro
06:22

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro

Published on: August 28, 2019

5.6K
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.1K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacovigilance and Regulatory Science
  • Statistical Modeling in Healthcare
  • Decision Analysis

Background:

  • Benefit-risk (BR) assessment is crucial throughout a medical product's lifecycle, from development to post-market surveillance.
  • The evolving nature of evidence presents a challenge for continuous BR assessment.
  • Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Reports (PBRERs) are recommended by regulators and ICH.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general statistical framework for periodic benefit-risk assessment.
  • To dynamically and effectively compare the acceptability of different drugs using accumulating evidence.
  • To enhance transparency and consistency in medical product decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Integration of Bayesian meta-analysis to synthesize accumulating evidence.
  • Application of stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) for decision-making.
  • Development of a framework adaptable to pre- and post-market settings.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework effectively synthesizes evolving evidence for BR assessment.
  • It allows for dynamic comparison of drug acceptability, accounting for uncertainties.
  • Demonstrated utility through application to two real-world examples.

Conclusions:

  • The combined Bayesian meta-analysis and SMAA approach offers a robust statistical framework for periodic BR assessment.
  • This method improves the dynamic evaluation of medical products and complements existing frameworks like sBRA.
  • Enhances transparency and consistency in regulatory and clinical decision-making processes.