Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Intra-Peritoneal Transplantation for Generating Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Mice
Published on: January 6, 2023
Development and Validation of a Novel RNA Sequencing-Based Prognostic Score for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Mei Wang1, Johan Lindberg2, Daniel Klevebring1
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background:
Recent progress in sequencing technologies allows us to explore comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic information to improve the current European LeukemiaNet (ELN) system of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Methods:
We compared the prognostic value of traditional demographic and cytogenetic risk factors, genomic data in the form of somatic aberrations of 25 AML-relevant genes, and whole-transcriptome expression profiling (RNA sequencing) in 267 intensively treated AML patients (Clinseq-AML). Multivariable penalized Cox models (overall survival [OS]) were developed for each data modality (clinical, genomic, transcriptomic), together with an associated prognostic risk score.
Results:
Of the three data modalities, transcriptomic data provided the best prognostic value, with an integrated area under the curve (iAUC) of a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.73. We developed a prognostic risk score (Clinseq-G) from transcriptomic data, which was validated in the independent The Cancer Genome Atlas AML cohort (RNA sequencing, n = 142, iAUC = 0.73, comparing the high-risk group with the low-risk group, hazard ratio [HR]OS = 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51 to 3.88). Comparison between Clinseq-G and ELN score iAUC estimates indicated strong evidence in favor of the Clinseq-G model (Bayes factor = 26.78). The proposed model remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis including the ELN and other well-known risk factors (HRos = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.30 to 4.22). We further validated the Clinseq-G model in a second independent data set (n = 458, iAUC = 0.66, adjusted HROS = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.33 to 3.08; adjusted HREFS = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.12).
Conclusions:
Our results indicate that the Clinseq-G prediction model, based on transcriptomic data from RNA sequencing, outperforms traditional clinical parameters and previously reported models based on genomic biomarkers.
More Related Videos
09:01Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
06:33Author Spotlight: Analyzing Bone Marrow Microenvironment in Murine Hematological Malignancies
Published on: November 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
RNA Editing
Bacterial RNA Polymerase
In most genes, the transcription site is a single base present upstream of the coding sequence. Though RNAP is a catalytically efficient enzyme, it does not recognize...