Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
Published on: November 3, 2010
Complex genetic interactions of novel Suppressor of Hairless alleles deficient in co-repressor binding
Anette Preiss1, Anja C Nagel1, Heiko Praxenthaler1
1Institute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Abstract:
Throughout the animal kingdom, the Notch signalling pathway allows cells to acquire diversified cell fates. Notch signals are translated into activation of Notch target genes by CSL transcription factors. In the absence of Notch signals, CSL together with co-repressors functions as a transcriptional repressor. In Drosophila, repression of Notch target genes involves the CSL homologue Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)) and the Notch (N) antagonist Hairless (H) that together form a repressor complex. Guided by crystal structure, three mutations Su(H)LL, Su(H)LLF and Su(H)LLL were generated that specifically affect interactions with the repressor H, and were introduced into the endogenous Su(H) locus by gene engineering. In contrast to the wild type isoform, these Su(H) mutants are incapable of repressor complex formation. Accordingly, Notch signalling activity is dramatically elevated in the homozygotes, resembling complete absence of H activity. It was noted, however, that heterozygotes do not display a dominant H loss of function phenotype. In this work we addressed genetic interactions the three H-binding deficient Su(H) mutants display in combination with H and N null alleles. We included a null mutant of Delta (Dl), encoding the ligand of the Notch receptor, as well as of Su(H) itself in our genetic analyses. H, N or Dl mutations cause dominant wing phenotypes that are sensitive to gene dose of the others. Moreover, H heterozygotes lack bristle organs and develop bristle sockets instead of shafts. The latter phenotype is suppressed by Su(H) null alleles but not by H-binding deficient Su(H) alleles which we attribute to the socket cell specific activity of Su(H). Modification of the dominant wing phenotypes of either H, N or Dl, however, suggested some lack of repressor activity in the Su(H) null allele and likewise in the H-binding deficient Su(H) alleles. Overall, Su(H) mutants are recessive perhaps reflecting self-adjusting availability of Su(H) protein.
Insights
New mutations in Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)) disrupt Notch signaling repression in Drosophila. These Su(H) mutants reveal insights into cell fate determination and gene regulation by the Notch pathway.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Biology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- The Notch signalling pathway is crucial for cell fate diversification across the animal kingdom.
- CSL transcription factors mediate Notch signal transduction, acting as repressors in the absence of Notch signals.
- In Drosophila, the CSL homologue Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)) and Hairless (H) form a repressor complex to inhibit Notch target genes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the function of Su(H) in Notch signalling repression by creating and analyzing mutations that specifically disrupt its interaction with Hairless (H).
- To explore the genetic interactions of these H-binding deficient Su(H) mutants with known components of the Notch pathway, including Notch (N) and Delta (Dl).
Main Methods:
- Generation of three specific Su(H) mutations (Su(H)LL, Su(H)LLF, Su(H)LLL) via gene engineering to impair H binding.
- Introduction of these mutations into the endogenous Su(H) locus in Drosophila.
- Analysis of genetic interactions between these Su(H) mutants and null alleles of H, N, and Delta (Dl), as well as Su(H) null alleles.
Main Results:
- The engineered Su(H) mutants were incapable of forming the repressor complex with H.
- Homozygotes of the Su(H) mutants exhibited dramatically elevated Notch signalling activity, mimicking the absence of H.
- Heterozygotes did not show a dominant H loss-of-function phenotype, but Su(H) null alleles suppressed H-associated bristle phenotypes, indicating socket cell-specific Su(H) activity.
- Both Su(H) null and H-binding deficient Su(H) alleles showed some lack of repressor activity, modifying dominant wing phenotypes.
Conclusions:
- The Su(H) protein's interaction with H is essential for effective Notch signalling repression.
- Su(H) possesses socket cell-specific activity crucial for bristle development.
- The engineered Su(H) mutants provide valuable tools for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of the Notch pathway and cell fate determination.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Co-activators and Co-repressors
Co-activators and Co-repressors
Prokaryotic Transcriptional Activators and Repressors
Transcription of prokaryotic...
Multiple Allele Traits
What is Population Genetics?
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

