Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

28.1K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
28.1K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

602
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
602
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

496
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
496
What is a Hypothesis?01:14

What is a Hypothesis?

15.2K
A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about a  property of the population. It can be stated for any field observations or experiments. A hypothesis statement cannot be said to be right or wrong as it is merely a statement. It needs to be tested through an elaborate data collection process and an appropriate statistical test. A hypothesis should be a general but not a vague...
15.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attention Networks Connectivity After Cognitive Rehabilitation in Alzheimer's Disease.

Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology·2026
Same author

Assessing receptive aphasia in patients after coma: Validation of the Brief Evaluation of Receptive Aphasia (BERA).

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same author

No evidence yet for functional independence of verbal short-term memory and long-term verbal knowledge.

Journal of neuropsychology·2026
Same author

The representation of serial order in working memory: A matter of space or time?

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

The interaction between language and consciousness.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Preserved phonological but impaired semantic processing in Williams syndrome: Evidence from a word association judgment task.

Research in developmental disabilities·2025
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K

Testing the redintegration hypothesis by a single probe recognition paradigm.

Benjamin Kowialiewski1,2, Steve Majerus1,2

  • 1a Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit (PsyNCog) , University of Liège , Liège , Belgium.

Memory (Hove, England)
|March 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The lexicality effect in verbal short-term memory (STM) shows words are recalled better than nonwords, suggesting long-term memory (LTM) influences STM. This study found strong lexicality effects in recognition tasks, challenging reconstruction-only theories.

Keywords:
Short-term memorylexicalityredintegrationrunning span

More Related Videos

Engineering Molecular Recognition with Bio-mimetic Polymers on Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes
09:28

Engineering Molecular Recognition with Bio-mimetic Polymers on Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Published on: January 10, 2017

8.6K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

59.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K
Engineering Molecular Recognition with Bio-mimetic Polymers on Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes
09:28

Engineering Molecular Recognition with Bio-mimetic Polymers on Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Published on: January 10, 2017

8.6K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

59.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • The lexicality effect in verbal short-term memory (STM) demonstrates superior recall for words over nonwords.
  • This effect is often attributed to the influence of linguistic long-term memory (LTM) knowledge.
  • The precise mechanisms underlying this LTM influence on STM remain debated, particularly in recognition tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the locus of the lexicality effect in verbal STM.
  • To test the prediction of the redintegrative account that LTM effects should be reduced in recognition paradigms.
  • To examine the role of reconstruction versus direct activation of LTM in STM recognition.

Main Methods:

  • A fast encoding probe recognition paradigm was employed.
  • Participants recognized lists of words and nonwords.
  • Performance (accuracy and speed) for word and nonword recognition was compared.

Main Results:

  • A significant lexicality effect was observed in the recognition task.
  • Recognition performance (accuracy and speed) was superior for words compared to nonwords.
  • The magnitude of the lexicality effect was substantial, contradicting predictions of strong redintegration models.

Conclusions:

  • The findings do not support a strong version of the redintegrative account where LTM effects in STM are solely due to reconstruction.
  • If redintegration plays a role in STM recognition, it must occur very rapidly.
  • The results lend support to models positing direct activation of lexico-semantic knowledge during verbal STM tasks.