Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Is there a best conventional material for restoring posterior primary teeth? A network meta-analysis
Carine Weber Pires1, Djessica Pedrotti2, Tathiane Larissa Lenzi2
1Centro Universitário da Serra Gaúcha - FSG, School of Dentistry, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Conventional glass ionomer cement shows higher failure rates in primary molar restorations compared to other materials. Pediatric dentists should avoid this material for restoring primary molars to improve longevity.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Dental Materials Science
Background:
- Assessing the long-term success of dental restorative materials in primary teeth is crucial for pediatric dental care.
- Conventional restorative materials are widely used in primary molars, but their comparative longevity varies.
- Evidence-based guidelines are needed to inform material selection for optimal outcomes in pediatric patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the longevity of various conventional restorative materials used in posterior primary teeth.
- To identify which materials offer superior durability and reduced failure rates in primary molars.
- To provide clinical recommendations for material choice in pediatric restorative dentistry.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review adhering to the PRISMAN statement was conducted, with PROSPERO registration (CRD42016035775).
- A comprehensive electronic search of multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, TRIP, Clinical Trials) was performed up to January 2017.
- Seventeen randomized clinical trials comparing the longevity of at least two conventional restorative materials in primary molars were included, with data analyzed using pairwise and network meta-analyses.
Main Results:
- Conventional glass ionomer cement demonstrated a significantly higher risk of failure when used for restoring primary molars compared to compomer, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, amalgam, and composite resin.
- The risk of bias assessment indicated a low risk in most evaluated studies (45.38% of all items across studies).
- Network meta-analysis confirmed the increased failure risk associated with conventional glass ionomer cement in this context.
Conclusions:
- Conventional glass ionomer cement is associated with a greater risk of failure in primary molar restorations.
- Pediatric dentists are advised against using conventional glass ionomer cement for restoring primary molars.
- Alternative materials like compomer, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, amalgam, and composite resin may offer better longevity for primary molar restorations.
More Related Videos
04:34Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
06:26Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
Published on: November 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Restorative Care
Network Covalent Solids
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups