Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Characterizing attentional resources.

W Hirst, D Kalmar

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
    |March 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Dividing attention is easier when competing messages are semantically dissimilar, requiring different central processing. This study investigated how semantic similarity impacts dual-task performance in attention research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Dimensional changes accompanying capillary condensation.

    Nature·2010
    Same author

    Central role of leukemia-derived factors in the development of leukemia-associated immune dysfunction.

    The hematology journal : the official journal of the European Haematology Association·2002
    Same author

    Whole blood assay for assessment of the mixed lymphocyte reaction.

    Journal of immunological methods·2001
    Same author

    Characterization of SB-271046: a potent, selective and orally active 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist.

    British journal of pharmacology·2000
    Same author

    In vitro immune modulation by antibodies coupled to tumour cells.

    Gene therapy·1998
    Same author

    The social construction of the remembered self: family recounting.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1997
    Same journal

    Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Human Attention Studies

    Background:

    • Dividing attention is generally easier when tasks differ in stimulus or response features.
    • Previous research suggests task separability influences attentional resource allocation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if dual-task performance depends on the similarity of central processing.
    • To explore the specific role of semantic similarity between competing messages in dual-task scenarios.

    Main Methods:

    • A dichotic listening task was employed.
    • Participants detected targets within concurrent messages.
    • Messages were manipulated to be either semantically similar or dissimilar, requiring similar or different central processing.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Dual-task performance was significantly affected by the semantic similarity of concurrent messages.
    • Semantically dissimilar messages, requiring different central processing, facilitated better attention division.
    • Criteria were developed to assess resource distinctiveness in dual-task conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Central processing similarity is a key factor in attentional resource competition.
    • Semantic similarity influences the ability to divide attention effectively.
    • Findings are discussed using resource metaphors: fuel, structure, and skills.