Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.0K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.0K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

407
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
407
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.8K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.8K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The network architecture of general intelligence in the human connectome.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Nutrition and Mental Health: Advances in Nutritional Cognitive Neuroscience.

Annual review of food science and technology·2026
Same author

Nutritional Cognitive Neuroscience: The Science of Mind, Brain, and Nutrition.

The Journal of nutrition·2025
Same author

Efforts to enhance reproducibility in a human performance research project.

F1000Research·2024
Same author

Differences in the Communication of Cancer Diagnoses by Different Health Professionals and the Impact of Oncologist Communication on Patients' Emotions.

Cancers·2024
Same author

Investigating nutrient biomarkers of healthy brain aging: a multimodal brain imaging study.

npj aging·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K

Individual differences in decision making competence revealed by multivariate fMRI.

Tanveer Talukdar1,2, Francisco J Román1,2, Joachim T Operskalski1,2

  • 1Decision Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.

Human Brain Mapping
|March 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in decision-making competence are linked to distinct brain connectivity patterns. These intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) support executive, social, and perceptual functions, explaining variations in decision-making skills.

Keywords:
Adult Decision Making Competence (A-DMC)individual differencemultivariate analysisresting-state fMRI

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Extensive research in decision neuroscience has explored group-level decision-making mechanisms.
  • Prior studies often overlook interindividual variability in cognitive performance and its neural underpinnings.
  • Understanding individual differences is crucial for a comprehensive view of decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between individual differences in decision-making competence and functional brain connectivity.
  • To identify specific brain regions and intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) associated with decision-making competence.
  • To explore how ICNs predict specific facets of decision-making ability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 304 healthy participants.
  • Assessed decision-making competence using the Adult Decision Making Competence (A-DMC) battery.
  • Performed connectome-wide association analyses and examined interactions between brain regions and ICNs.

Main Results:

  • Identified significant associations between decision-making competence and functional connectivity in frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortical regions.
  • Found that ICNs supporting executive, social, and perceptual processes predict specific decision-making competencies.
  • Demonstrated that functional interactions within ICNs mediate individual differences in decision-making competence.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in decision-making competence are associated with distinct functional brain connectivity patterns.
  • Intrinsic connectivity networks play a key role in mediating variations in decision-making abilities.
  • These findings support an integrative framework for understanding the neural basis of individual differences in decision-making competence.