Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Measuring Influenza Neutralizing Antibody Responses to AH3N2 Viruses in Human Sera by Microneutralization Assays Using MDCK-SIAT1 Cells
Published on: November 22, 2017
Maternally-derived antibodies do not inhibit swine influenza virus replication in piglets but decrease excreted virus
Céline Deblanc1, Séverine Hervé1, Stéphane Gorin1
1ANSES, Ploufragan / Plouzané Laboratory, Swine Virology Immunology Unit, BP53, 22440 Ploufragan, France; Université Bretagne Loire, France.
Maternally-derived antibodies (MDA) in piglets impact swine influenza A virus (H1N1) infection and immune responses. Despite MDA affecting humoral immunity, all piglets, regardless of MDA status, achieved protection against reinfection.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Immunology
- Virology
- Swine Health
Background:
- Maternally-derived antibodies (MDA) confer passive immunity to piglets against swine influenza A virus (H1N1).
- However, MDA can interfere with active immune responses and vaccine efficacy, raising questions about protection after passive immunity wanes.
- Understanding MDA's impact is crucial for optimizing H1N1 control strategies in piglets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of varying residual MDA levels on H1N1 virus excretion and immune responses in piglets.
- To assess the impact of MDA on protection against a secondary homologous H1N1 infection.
- To compare responses in piglets from vaccinated (MDA+) versus unvaccinated (MDA-) sows.
Main Methods:
- Piglets from vaccinated (MDA+) and unvaccinated (MDA-) sows were infected with H1N1 at 5, 7, or 11 weeks of age.
- Virus excretion, clinical signs, and humoral (HI, neutralizing, anti-NP/M) and cellular (T cell proliferation) immune responses were monitored.
- Protection against a homologous H1N1 challenge four weeks post-primary infection was evaluated.
Main Results:
- MDA- piglets exhibited clinical signs and virus shedding, with age-dependent variations in severity and duration.
- MDA+ piglets showed increased clinical signs correlating with lower MDA levels; virus shedding was not prevented but viral particles from younger MDA+ piglets were less infectious.
- MDA significantly impacted humoral responses (HI, neutralizing) but less so anti-NP/M and T cell proliferation; all piglets, regardless of MDA status, were protected from reinfection.
Conclusions:
- Piglet responses to H1N1 are influenced by both the piglet's physiological development at the time of infection and the level of MDA.
- MDA can modulate but does not abrogate protective immunity against subsequent H1N1 infection.
- These findings highlight the complex interplay between passive immunity and active immune development in H1N1-infected piglets.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What are Viruses?
Humoral Immune Responses
What is the Immune System?
Introduction to Virus
Viruses of Archaea
Viruses with RNA Genomes

