Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms
Published on: August 15, 2016
Recovery in the Severely Impaired Arm Post-Stroke After Mirror Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Study
Wing Chiu Chan1, Stephanie S Y Au-Yeung
1From the Department of Physiotherapy, Haven of Hope Hospital, TKO, Hong Kong SAR, China (WCC); and Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China (SSYA-Y).
Mirror therapy and control therapy showed similar effectiveness in improving arm motor recovery for stroke survivors. Both interventions, involving exercises for both arms, promoted comparable functional gains in the severely impaired limb.
Area of Science:
- Neurorehabilitation
- Stroke Recovery
- Motor Rehabilitation
Background:
- Stroke frequently results in severe upper limb impairment, significantly impacting patient independence.
- Early rehabilitation is crucial for motor recovery in the subacute phase post-stroke.
- Mirror therapy is a potential intervention to enhance motor function, but its efficacy in severe impairment requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of mirror therapy compared to a control therapy for arm recovery in patients with severe hemiparesis after stroke.
- To assess the impact of mirror therapy on motor function using standardized outcome measures.
Main Methods:
- A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 41 patients within 1 month post-stroke.
- Participants were assigned to either mirror therapy (n=20) or control therapy (n=21) for 4 weeks, 30 minutes twice daily, alongside conventional rehabilitation.
- Both groups performed similar structured bimanual exercises; the mirror therapy group used visual feedback from the unaffected limb's reflection, while the control group did not use a mirror.
Main Results:
- Both mirror therapy and control therapy groups demonstrated significant improvements in arm motor function.
- There were no statistically significant differences between the mirror therapy and control therapy groups in Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores (P = 0.867).
- Similarly, no significant differences were observed in Wolf Motor Function Test-Time (P = 0.947) or Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale (P = 0.676) between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Mirror therapy and control therapy, involving concurrent exercises for both paretic and unaffected arms during the subacute stroke phase, yield comparable motor recovery in the severely impaired arm.
- These findings suggest that structured bimanual exercise, with or without mirror visual feedback, can effectively promote motor recovery in this patient population.
More Related Videos
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
11:29Real-time Video Projection in an MRI for Characterization of Neural Correlates Associated with Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain
Published on: April 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Muscles that Move the Arm
The pectoralis major has two origins. Its clavicular head originates on the medial half of the clavicle. In contrast, the sternocostal head originates on the costal cartilages of ribs 1-6, the sternum, and the aponeurosis of the external oblique of the...
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...