Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication
Published on: June 6, 2012
A Benchmark Study of Electronic Couplings in Donor-Bridge-Acceptor Systems with the FMR-B Method
Alessandro Biancardi1, Marco Caricato1
1Department of Chemistry , University of Kansas , 1251 Wescoe Hall Drive , Lawrence , Kansas 66045 , United States.
Abstract:
We present a benchmarking study for the evaluation of electronic couplings in donor-bridge-acceptor systems with the Fock matrix reconstruction-bridge (FMR-B) method. We compile a data set for the benchmark that contains 29 molecules for which reliable experimental coupling values are available: DBA29. This data set is general and includes different types of donor, acceptor, and bridge units as well as different bridge lengths, and it spans a range of couplings from 0.1 to 0.8 eV. We use DBA29 to test FMR-B with 11 density functionals belonging to different classes (pure, global hybrid, and range-separated) and the Hartree-Fock (HF) method. We also test a subset of these methods with nine basis sets from the Pople and Dunning families, which include a varying number of polarization and diffuse functions. We find that the best accuracy and lowest computational cost is obtained with range-separated functionals and compact basis sets. Global hybrids with a large amount of HF exchange also work well because of error cancellation between the approximate exchange-correlation kernel and the HF part. Pure functionals, although less accurate, still provide reasonable results with a consistent underestimation of the experimental values, and they can be used for larger and more computationally demanding systems.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Strain Gauge Bridge or Wheatstone Bridge
Wheatstone Bridge
Thus, for accurate resistance measurements, a...
Bridge rectifier
Operationally, the bridge rectifier allows current flow through two of its diodes during each...
Cross-bridge Cycle
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...

