Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.2K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.2K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

8.9K
8.9K
Metal-Ligand Bonds02:51

Metal-Ligand Bonds

24.5K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
24.5K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.6K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.6K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.2K
4.2K
Targets for Drug Action: Overview01:26

Targets for Drug Action: Overview

10.5K
Drugs target macromolecules to modify ongoing cellular processes. Primary drug targets include receptors, ion channels, transporters, and enzymes.
Receptors are either membrane-spanning or intracellular proteins, which upon binding a ligand, get activated and transmit the signal downstream to elicit a response. Drugs bind receptors, either mimicking the action of endogenous ligands or blocking the receptor activity to bring about a modified response. Nearly 35% of approved drugs target the G...
10.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Entropy quantum computing for fixed-backbone protein design.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Relative BAT: An Automated Tool for Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations by the Separated Topologies Approach.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Discovery of Novel Isofunctional SARS-CoV‑2 NSP14 RNA Cap Methyltransferase Inhibitors by Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2025
Same author

Discovery, Optimization, and Evaluation of Non-Nucleoside SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 Inhibitors.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Comparing Molecules Generated by MMPDB and REINVENT4 with Ideas from Drug Discovery Design Teams.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

A potent and selective TNKS2 inhibitor for tumor-selective WNT suppression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening
08:34

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening

Published on: October 16, 2015

10.6K

Quantitative metrics for drug-target ligandability.

Sinisa Vukovic1, David J Huggins2

  • 1Department of Physics, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 19 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK.

Drug Discovery Today
|March 10, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Ligandability, a key factor for drug development, can be quantified using a novel metric balancing effort and reward. This approach aids in predicting the tractability of new drug targets.

More Related Videos

A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction
05:28

A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction

Published on: August 27, 2019

17.7K
Pharmacophore Modeling for Targets with Extensive Ligand Libraries: A Case Study on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro
05:50

Pharmacophore Modeling for Targets with Extensive Ligand Libraries: A Case Study on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro

Published on: September 26, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening
08:34

A Rapid and Quantitative Fluorimetric Method for Protein-Targeting Small Molecule Drug Screening

Published on: October 16, 2015

10.6K
A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction
05:28

A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction

Published on: August 27, 2019

17.7K
Pharmacophore Modeling for Targets with Extensive Ligand Libraries: A Case Study on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro
05:50

Pharmacophore Modeling for Targets with Extensive Ligand Libraries: A Case Study on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro

Published on: September 26, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Drug discovery and development
  • Computational chemistry
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Ligandability is essential for determining a drug target's druggability.
  • Predicting ligandability is simpler than predicting pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics.
  • A quantitative metric for ligandability is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a metric for quantifying ligandability from experimental data.
  • To assess ligandability of known drug targets using the proposed metric.
  • To guide systematic improvement of computational ligandability predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing existing literature on ligandability and druggability.
  • Developing a metric based on effort-reward balance.
  • Applying the metric to well-studied drug targets.

Main Results:

  • The proposed metric quantifies ligandability based on experimental data.
  • Evaluation across diverse drug targets provides insights into their ligandability.
  • The metric offers a framework for assessing the balance between effort and reward in drug development.

Conclusions:

  • The developed metric provides a quantitative measure of ligandability.
  • This metric can systematically enhance computational predictions for novel drug targets.
  • Predicting tractability of new targets is feasible using this approach.