Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

A Practical Guide for the Production and PET/CT Imaging of 68Ga-DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Daily Clinical Practice
Published on: April 17, 2019
Current and Novel Techniques for Metal Artifact Reduction at CT: Practical Guide for Radiologists
Masaki Katsura1, Jiro Sato1, Masaaki Akahane1
1From the Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine (M.K., J.S., O.A.), and the Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Science (A.K.), the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; and the Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan (M.A.).
Metal artifacts in computed tomography (CT) degrade image quality. Metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms and dual-energy CT (DECT) techniques help mitigate these artifacts, improving diagnostic value.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Image Processing
Background:
- Metallic implants in computed tomography (CT) cause artifacts like streaks, reducing image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
- These artifacts stem from physical effects such as photon starvation and beam hardening when X-rays interact with metal objects.
- Existing methods aim to improve image quality and recover underlying structural information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare and contrast projection-based metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms and dual-energy CT (DECT) techniques for mitigating artifacts caused by metallic implants.
- To inform radiologists about the clinical and technical features of each method for optimal patient management.
Main Methods:
- Projection-based MAR algorithms interpolate corrupted projection data to reduce artifacts, primarily addressing photon starvation.
- Dual-energy CT (DECT) utilizes two different X-ray energy spectra to synthesize virtual monochromatic images.
- High kiloelectron volt virtual monochromatic images from DECT are effective in reducing beam hardening artifacts.
Main Results:
- MAR algorithms are applied post-acquisition and primarily target photon starvation artifacts.
- DECT requires pre-acquisition decisions and offers synthesized images that reduce beam hardening.
- Both methods aim to enhance image quality in the presence of metallic implants.
Conclusions:
- Radiologists need to understand the distinct characteristics of MAR algorithms and DECT.
- The choice between MAR and DECT depends on the clinical situation and the specific artifacts encountered.
- Familiarity with these techniques allows for optimal selection to improve CT diagnostic value in patients with metallic implants.
Related Concept Videos
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions
Bonding in Metals
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
Alkali Metals
Table 1: Properties of the alkali metals
Properties of Transition Metals

