Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Standardized EEG interpretation in patients after cardiac arrest: Correlation with other prognostic predictors
Isabelle Beuchat1, Daria Solari2, Jan Novy1
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Introduction:
Standardized EEG patterns according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) ("highly malignant", "malignant" and "benign") demonstrated good correlation with outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). However, this approach relates to EEGs after target temperature management (TTM), and correlation to other recognized outcome predictors remains unknown.
Objectives:
To investigate the relationship between categorized EEG and other outcome predictors, during and after TTM, at different temperatures.
Methods:
In a prospective adult CA registry between 01.2014 and 06.2017, EEG at day one and two after CA were reclassified into pre-defined categories. Correlations between EEG and clinical, biochemical, neurophysiological outcome predictors, and prognosis (CPC at three months; good: 1-2), were assessed.
Results:
Of 203 CA episodes, 31.5% were managed targeting 33 °C, 60.6% targeting 36 °C, and 7.9% with spontaneous temperature. "Highly malignant" EEG was found in 36.7% of patients at day one (predicting poor prognosis with 91% specificity -95%CI: 83%-97%-, and 63% sensitivity -95% CI: 53%-72%), and 27.1% at day two. "Benign" EEG occurred in 19.2% at day one (sensitivity to good prognosis: 35% -95%CI: 26%-46%-, positive predictive value: 89% -95% CI: 75%-97%), and in 33.2% at day two. Categorized EEG showed robust correlations with all prognostic predictors. Results were similar between EEGs recorded at day one or two, and, especially for poor prognosis, across TTM targets.
Discussion:
Standardized EEG categorization after CA shows strong correlation with other outcome predictors, without marked variation across EEG recording time or TTM targets, underscoring its prognostic role in a multimodal approach.
Related Concept Videos
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient
Correlation between ECG and Cardiac Cycle
A cardiac action potential originates in the SA node and spreads throughout the atria and the AV node in approximately 0.03 seconds. This results in the P wave in an ECG and triggers atrial contraction. The action potential is then briefly slowed at the AV node, allowing the atria to contract and fill the ventricles with blood before...
Chebyshev's Theorem to Interpret Standard Deviation
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation
For instance, the range rule of thumb can be used to find the tallest and the shortest student in a class, given the mean student height and standard deviation. If the mean student height is 1.6 m and the standard deviation, s is 0.05 m, the height...
Correlations

