How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Jason Brown1, Mark Duggan2, Ilyana Kuziemko3
1US Treasury, Washington, DC.
Abstract:
To combat adverse selection, governments increasingly base payments to health plans and providers on enrollees’ scores from risk-adjustment formulae. In 2004, Medicare began to risk-adjust capitation payments to private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans to reduce selection-driven overpayments. But because the variance of medical costs increases with the predicted mean, incentivizing enrollment of individuals with higher scores can increase the scope for enrolling "overpriced" individuals with costs significantly below the formula's prediction. Indeed, after risk adjustment, MA plans enrolled individuals with higher scores but lower costs conditional on their score. We find no evidence that overpayments were on net reduced.
Insights
Government risk adjustment in Medicare Advantage plans aimed to reduce overpayments but enrolled higher-scoring, lower-cost individuals, failing to net reduce overpayments.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Public health policy
- Healthcare management
Background:
- Governments use risk adjustment to set payments for health plans and providers.
- Medicare Advantage (MA) plans use risk adjustment to mitigate selection bias and overpayments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of Medicare's risk adjustment policy implemented in 2004.
- To determine if risk adjustment successfully reduced overpayments by preventing enrollment of high-risk, low-cost individuals.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of enrollment data and medical costs in Medicare Advantage plans post-risk adjustment.
- Assessment of the relationship between enrollee risk scores and actual medical costs.
Main Results:
- Medicare Advantage plans enrolled individuals with higher risk scores after policy implementation.
- Enrollees with higher risk scores exhibited lower medical costs than predicted by the risk-adjustment formula.
- No evidence was found to support a net reduction in overpayments.
Conclusions:
- Risk adjustment in Medicare Advantage may inadvertently incentivize the enrollment of individuals with lower-than-predicted costs.
- The current risk-adjustment model may not effectively control for adverse selection or reduce overall overpayments.
- Policy adjustments may be necessary to improve the accuracy and fairness of Medicare Advantage payments.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
The Evidence for Evolution
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

