Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Bioluminescent Orthotopic Model of Pancreatic Cancer Progression
Published on: June 28, 2013
Differences in Nanoparticle Uptake in Transplanted and Autochthonous Models of Pancreatic Cancer
Zhimin Tao1, Mandar Deepak Muzumdar1,2,3,4, Alexandre Detappe1,2,3
1Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT , 500 Main Street , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.
Abstract:
Human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) contains a distinctively dense stroma that limits the accessibility of anticancer drugs, contributing to its poor overall prognosis. Nanoparticles can enhance drug delivery and retention in pancreatic tumors and have been utilized clinically for their treatment. In preclinical studies, various mouse models differentially recapitulate the microenvironmental features of human PDAC. Here, we demonstrate that through utilization of different organic cosolvents and by doping of a homopolymer of poly(ε-caprolactone), a diblock copolymer composition of poly(ethylene oxide)- block-poly(ε-caprolactone) may be utilized to generate biodegradable and nanoscale micelles with different physical properties. Noninvasive optical imaging was employed to examine the pharmacology and biodistribution of these various nanoparticle formulations in both allografted and autochthonous mouse models of PDAC. In contrast to the results reported with transplanted tumors, spherical micelles as large as 300 nm in diameter were found to extravasate in the autochthonous model, reaching a distance of approximately 20 μm from the nearest tumor cell clusters. A lipophilic platinum(IV) prodrug of oxaliplatin was further able to achieve a ∼7-fold higher peak accumulation and a ∼50-fold increase in its retention half-life in pancreatic tumors when delivered with 100 nm long worm-like micelles as when compared to the free drug formulation of oxaliplatin. Through further engineering of nanoparticle properties, as well as by widespread adoption of the autochthonous tumor model for preclinical testing, future therapeutic formulations may further enhance the targeting and penetration of anticancer agents to improve survival outcomes in PDAC.
Related Concept Videos
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...

