Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

429
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
429
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention01:30

Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

346
Accurate diagnosis and effective prevention are critical in managing Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), which is linked to high mortality rates ranging from 10% to 80%. Timely recognition of at-risk patients and careful monitoring can significantly reduce the likelihood of kidney damage.Diagnostic Assessments:The diagnostic process starts with a comprehensive medical history to identify prerenal, intrarenal, and postrenal causes.Prerenal causes, such as dehydration, hypotension, or blood loss, should...
346
Pilot and Numeric Relaying01:21

Pilot and Numeric Relaying

496
Pilot relaying is a type of differential protection used in power systems. It compares electrical quantities at the terminals of equipment via a communication channel instead of direct relay interconnection. This method is essential for transmission lines where the terminals are far apart, typically up to 80 km for lines with 69 to 115 kV ratings. Four types of communication channels are used for pilot relaying:
496

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnosis and Management of Tinea Infections.

American family physician·2025
Same author

Dependent Adult Abuse Trends in Iowa, 1984 to 2023.

Journal of primary care & community health·2024
Same author

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in emergency medicine: a narrative review.

Acute medicine & surgery·2022
Same author

Empathy is a poor foundation on which to base legislative medical policy.

Bioethics·2018
Same author

Black Clouds vs Random Variation in Hospital Admissions.

Family medicine·2018
Same author

Are noninferiority studies ethically inferior?

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K

Checklists to prevent diagnostic errors: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

John W Ely1, Mark A Graber2

  • 11Carver College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)
|March 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Diagnostic checklists did not reduce overall diagnostic errors in primary care. However, a subgroup analysis showed potential benefits for emergency physicians, suggesting further research is warranted.

Keywords:
checklistdiagnostic errorsemergency medicineprimary health carerandomized controlled trial

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.6K
Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.6K
Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Clinical Practice Improvement
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Diagnostic errors, often due to premature diagnostic closure, pose a significant patient safety risk.
  • Checklists were developed to prompt physicians to consider a broader range of diagnoses for common primary care presentations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of diagnostic checklists in reducing diagnostic errors in primary care settings.
  • To compare diagnostic error rates between physicians using checklists and those receiving usual care.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized clinical trial involving 14 primary care physicians and 100 patients across emergency and clinic settings.
  • Physicians were randomized to either usual care or a differential diagnosis checklist intervention.
  • Diagnostic error was assessed by comparing initial diagnoses with outcomes from a 1-month follow-up review.

Main Results:

  • The overall diagnostic error rate was not significantly different between checklist and usual-care groups (11.2% vs. 17.8%).
  • Emergency physicians using checklists showed a trend towards lower error rates (19.1% vs. 45.0%, p=0.04).
  • Checklist physicians considered significantly more diagnoses per encounter (6.5 vs. 3.4, p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Diagnostic checklists did not significantly reduce overall diagnostic error rates in this study.
  • Further development and testing in larger studies may be warranted, particularly for specific settings like emergency departments.