Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experiments on genetic risk perception and decision making: explorative studies.

G d'Ydewalle, G Evers-Kiebooms

    Birth Defects Original Article Series
    |January 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Attitudes toward predictive testing for Alzheimer's disease in a student population.

    Behavioural neurology·2014
    Same author

    Reproductive options for prospective parents in families with Huntington's disease: clinical, psychological and ethical reflections.

    Human reproduction update·2013
    Same author

    Recommendations for the predictive genetic test in Huntington's disease.

    Clinical genetics·2012
    Same author

    BRCA1/2 predictive testing and gender: uptake, motivation and psychological characteristics.

    Genetic counseling (Geneva, Switzerland)·2010
    Same author

    A theoretical psychological perspective on predictive testing for late onset hereditary diseases.

    Genetic counseling (Geneva, Switzerland)·2008
    Same author

    Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure.

    Journal of genetic counseling·2005

    Cognitive psychology research on risk perception and decision-making highlights that information context and joint decision complexities significantly impact genetic counseling outcomes, challenging existing rational models.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Medical Decision Making
    • Genetic Counseling

    Background:

    • Risk perception and decision-making under uncertainty are key areas in cognitive psychology.
    • Applying cognitive frameworks to genetic counseling presents unique challenges.
    • Existing models may overlook contextual factors and decision-making complexities.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate how individuals process and recall genetic information (Huntington's disease).
    • To evaluate agreement with decision-making models (Pauker & Pauker) and the impact of using such techniques.
    • To analyze joint decision-making processes for genetic diseases (Hemophilia, Down syndrome) and identify influencing factors.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of cognitive psychology studies on risk perception.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental studies on information processing, memorability, and decision-making in genetic counseling scenarios.
  • Comparison of individual versus joint decision-making processes for different genetic conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Information context significantly affects memorability of genetic data.
    • Decision-making models may not align with individual choices, and their use can alter outcomes.
    • Joint decision-making processes vary significantly based on disease characteristics (risk, burden), differing from individual decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • The context of information delivery is crucial for understanding genetic information processing.
    • Decision-making models in genetic counseling need to account for the complexities of joint decisions and individual variability.
    • Assumptions of total rationality in decision-makers may be inadequate in real-world genetic counseling scenarios.