Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
Normative accuracy and response time data for the computerized Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT-c)
Bruno Rossion1,2,3, Caroline Michel4
1Psychological Sciences Research Institute and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. bruno.rossion@uclouvain.be.
This study provides normative data for the computerized Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT-c) in young adults. Results show accuracy is good but response time is a critical measure for identifying face recognition impairments.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Facial recognition is a complex cognitive process crucial for social interaction.
- The classical Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT) is a widely used tool for assessing facial recognition abilities.
- A computerized version (BFRT-c) offers potential for standardized administration and data collection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish normative data for a computerized Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT-c) in a large sample of young adults.
- To evaluate the BFRT-c's validity and reliability as a clinical tool for identifying facial recognition deficits.
- To explore factors influencing performance, including sex differences and types of visual transformations.
Main Methods:
- A large sample of 307 young adults completed the computerized long form of the Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT-c).
- Participants matched target face photographs to simultaneously presented options.
- Data collected included accuracy rates and response times for each item.
Main Results:
- The BFRT-c demonstrated good accuracy (81%-83%) above chance, with low interindividual variance.
- Response times provided a reliable complementary measure of performance, with average completion time of 3 minutes.
- Females outperformed males, particularly on female faces. Performance was lower with lighting changes than head rotations.
Conclusions:
- The BFRT-c is a valid and sensitive tool for assessing facial recognition, supporting its use in clinical batteries.
- Normative data from this study aid in identifying impairments, such as those seen in prosopagnosia.
- Researchers should consider both accuracy and response time, along with performance variability, for comprehensive assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Precision
Muscles for Facial Expressions
Facial Feedback Hypothesis

