Predictors of good function: the Framingham Study

This paper asks the question: among 1474 Framingham Study participants aged 35-68 years who were healthy at their fourth examination (1954-1958), what are the physiologic, behavioral, and demographic characteristics that distinguish those who survive and report good function from those who do not after 21 years of biennial observations? Although a larger proportion of women than men survived, their functional status was not as good. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age, alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, ventricular rate, and education were all significantly related to functional status for men, with all but the last of these factors inversely related to good function. For women, the only significant predictor other than age was education, which, as with men, was directly associated with good function. The effect of education is probably mediated by numerous factors such as availability and use of health care services, quality of health care, occupation, and lifestyle.