Related Experiment Videos
Change gout: how to deal with this "silently-developing killer" in everyday clinical practice
Carlo Alberto Scirè1,2, Cristina Rossi3, Leonardo Punzi4
1a Epidemiology Unit , Italian Society for Rheumatology , Milan , Italy.
Insights
Gout diagnosis and management are challenging despite its treatable nature. Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary care, including pharmacological urate-lowering therapy, are crucial for effective gout control.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Gout diagnosis and management present significant challenges.
- Clinical presentation and experience often substitute for definitive diagnostic tests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current challenges in gout management.
- To propose potential solutions for improved patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on gout diagnosis and management.
- Discussion of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies.
- Evaluation of novel therapeutic agents like lesinurad.
Main Results:
- Early diagnosis is critical but often hindered by lack of specialized tests.
- Comprehensive management requires monitoring serum uric acid (sUA) levels (<6 mg/dL), risk assessment, and continuous evaluation.
- Pharmacological urate-lowering therapy, including xanthine-oxidase inhibitors (XOI) and uricosuric agents (e.g., lesinurad), is essential for optimal control.
Conclusions:
- Multidisciplinary management ensures treatment continuity and improves outcomes.
- Educational initiatives for healthcare professionals are vital to enhance gout diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment awareness.
Background:
Despite being regarded as an easily-treatable disease, gout diagnosis and management can be challenging.
Review:
This review discusses current issues in gout management and proposes some potential solutions. Gout diagnosis should be reached as early as possible and often requires specific tests, such as synovial fluid analysis or imaging techniques that are not available in most centers, leaving healthcare professionals to rely only on clinical presentations and their experience. In addition, gout management requires the evaluation of multiple aspects, such as monitoring of serum uric acid (sUA) level (which should be reduced to <6 mg/dL) to ensure adherence and efficacy of treatment, evaluation of patient's risk profile and comorbidities, and continuous assessments to manage clinical manifestations. An important premise in gout management is non-pharmacological intervention; however, pharmacological urate-lowering therapy is crucial for an optimal control of the disease. Available options include xanthine-oxidase inhibitors (XOI), targeting uric acid overproduction, and uricosuric agents which target the predominant cause of hyperuricemia (under-excretion). Among these, lesinurad is the novel uricosuric agent to be used in combination with XOI in patients with gout not adequately controlled with XOI alone, which can further contribute to the control of hyperuricemia in gout.
Conclusions:
Multidisciplinary management is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of gout, in order to ensure treatment continuity and improve management. This review, therefore, advises that educational activities for General Practitioners and specialists should be implemented to help raise awareness on gout diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment.