Cervical biomarkers as predictors of successful induction of labour by Foley catheter

The prediction of successful labour induction is difficult, indicating a need for a biomarker test. Little is known about the effect of Foley catheter (FC) induction on biochemical mediators in the cervix, such as the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and their inhibitors (TIMP). We enrolled 35 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies, intact amniotic membranes and cephalic presentation ≥40 gestational weeks scheduled for labour induction by FC. Serial cervical swab samples were collected at FC insertion and expulsion. The concentrations of IGFBP-1, PhIGFBP-1, MMP-8, MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were analysed. The IGFBP-1 and phIGFBP-1 concentrations increased during the FC-induced cervical ripening. In contrast, MMP-8 and MMP-9 concentrations decreased. However, these changes did not predict the outcome of the labour induction, thus appearing not suitable for clinical use. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? During cervical ripening, various constituents interact in a complex network. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMP) appear to play a role in cervical ripening. The mechanism of Foley catheter on cervical ripening consists of direct mechanical stretching of the cervix and lower uterine segment, and the stimulation of local secretion of endogenous prostaglandins. What do the results of this study add? This study investigated the role of cervical biochemical mediators during Foley catheter-induced cervical ripening, and their predictive value in a successful labour induction and vaginal delivery. The IGFBP-1 and phosphorylated IGFBP-1 concentrations increased, whereas MMP-8 and MMP-9 concentrations decreased during the Foley catheter-induced cervical ripening in nulliparous women. However, these changes did not predict the outcome of labour induction, thus appearing not suitable for clinical use. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Prediction of a successful labour induction is difficult, indicating a need for a biomarker test. Future studies with larger data are needed for investigating the role of these cervical biomarkers in successful labour induction, and in developing a future bedside a screening tool for clinical use.