Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Implementation of a Hyperbolic Vortex Plasma Reactor for the Removal of Micropollutants in Water
Published on: July 25, 2025
Micropollutants removal by full-scale UV-C/sulfate radical based Advanced Oxidation Processes
J Rodríguez-Chueca1, E Laski2, C García-Cañibano3
1Department of Chemical and Environmental Technology (ESCET), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, C/ Tulipán s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain; Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Madrid, (UPM), C/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or peroxymonosulfate (PMS) with UV-C light effectively remove micropollutants (MPs) in wastewater. H2O2/UV-C offers better cost-efficiency than PMS/UV-C for MP treatment.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Water Treatment Technologies
- Chemical Oxidation
Background:
- Micropollutants (MPs) persist in wastewater due to high chemical stability and low biodegradability.
- Conventional wastewater treatment struggles to remove a wide range of MPs.
- Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) show promise for MP removal at lab-scale, but full-scale data is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the full-scale application of three AOPs (H2O2/UV-C, PMS/UV-C, PS/UV-C) for micropollutant removal.
- To compare the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of different AOPs in tertiary wastewater treatment.
- To determine optimal oxidant dosages and UV-C contact times for MP abatement.
Main Methods:
- Application of homogeneous oxidants (H2O2, PMS, PS) in conjunction with UV-C tertiary treatment at the Estiviel WWTP.
- Testing low oxidant dosages (0.05-0.5 mM) and short UV-C contact times (4-18 s).
- Quantification of the removal efficiency for 25 different MPs.
Main Results:
- AOPs significantly outperformed UV-C radiation alone in removing 25 MPs.
- H2O2/UV-C and PMS/UV-C achieved similar average MP removal rates (48-55%) at optimal conditions (0.5 mM, 18 s).
- H2O2/UV-C demonstrated superior cost-efficiency (€/m³·order) compared to PMS/UV-C and UV-C alone.
Conclusions:
- AOPs, particularly H2O2/UV-C, are effective and cost-efficient for full-scale micropollutant removal in wastewater.
- Low oxidant dosages and short UV-C contact times are sufficient for significant MP abatement.
- The addition of H2O2 can compensate for increased UV-C energy consumption, enhancing overall treatment efficiency.
Related Concept Videos
Radical Oxidation of Allylic and Benzylic Alcohols
Oxidation Numbers
Sulfate Attack on Concrete
Sulfates from sources like soil, groundwater, or industrial effluents...
Pyruvate Oxidation
First, the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase removes the carboxyl group from pyruvate and releases it as carbon dioxide. The stripped molecule is then oxidized and releases electrons, which are then picked up by NAD+...
pH Scale
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions

