Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

427
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
427
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.3K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.4K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.4K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
Partial Fractions01:28

Partial Fractions

230
A partial fraction is a component of a rational expression represented as the sum of simpler fractions. When a rational function is expressed as a ratio of two polynomials, it can often be decomposed into a sum of fractions whose denominators are simpler polynomials, typically linear or irreducible quadratic factors. This process is called partial fraction decomposition, and it is used to simplify complex expressions for integration, solving equations, or analysis.Partial fraction decomposition...
230
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.1K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome-wide methylation profiling of diagnostic tumor specimens identified DNA methylation markers associated with metastasis among men with untreated localized prostate cancer.

Cancer medicine·2023
Same author

Out-of-Pocket Costs for Men Undergoing Infertility Care and Associated Financial Strain.

Urology practice·2023
Same author

Internally versus externally trained residents and fellows hired as attendings at a large integrated healthcare system: a 20-year retrospective study.

Human resources for health·2023
Same author

Comparison of tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific clinical oncology trial designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Future oncology (London, England)·2023
Same author

Early and late implications of COVID-19 on male reproductive health: 3 years of data.

Sexual medicine reviews·2023
Same author

Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with treating hypertension in pregnancy at different thresholds.

Pharmacotherapy·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy
08:34

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy

Published on: January 2, 2026

631

Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy.

Pooya Banapour1, George A Abdelsayed1, Zoe Bider-Canfield2

  • 1Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, 4900 Sunset Blvd, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.

Journal of Robotic Surgery
|March 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (robotic and laparoscopic) shows better outcomes than open surgery, especially for complex kidney tumors. Robotic partial nephrectomy offers shorter operative times and ischemia compared to laparoscopic approaches.

Keywords:
LaparoscopyNephrectomyRenal cancerRoboticSurgical procedures

More Related Videos

Robotic D3 Partial Duodenal Resection with Primary Side-to-Side Anastomosis
10:41

Robotic D3 Partial Duodenal Resection with Primary Side-to-Side Anastomosis

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.7K
Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
11:19

Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy
08:34

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy

Published on: January 2, 2026

631
Robotic D3 Partial Duodenal Resection with Primary Side-to-Side Anastomosis
10:41

Robotic D3 Partial Duodenal Resection with Primary Side-to-Side Anastomosis

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.7K
Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
11:19

Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard for localized renal tumors.
  • Robotic (RPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and open (OPN) partial nephrectomy are common approaches.
  • Matching techniques by nephrometry score is crucial for accurate comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare perioperative outcomes of RPN, LPN, and OPN.
  • To evaluate the impact of nephrometry scores on outcomes.
  • To guide surgical approach selection for partial nephrectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 862 patients (2007-2014) undergoing RPN, LPN, or OPN.
  • Patients matched for R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores.
  • Comparison of estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), ischemia time (IT), operative time (OT), change in eGFR, and positive margin rates.

Main Results:

  • Minimally invasive techniques (LPN, RPN) showed significantly lower EBL, LOS, IT, and change in eGFR compared to OPN when matched for nephrometry scores.
  • These benefits were more pronounced for higher nephrometry scores (≥8).
  • RPN demonstrated shorter OT and IT than LPN for higher nephrometry scores (≥7).

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy offers superior perioperative outcomes compared to OPN, particularly for complex renal tumors.
  • Robotic partial nephrectomy may provide additional advantages in operative time and ischemia duration over laparoscopic approaches for challenging cases.
  • Findings support the use of minimally invasive techniques in partial nephrectomy decision-making.