Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Functional Approach for Coronary Artery Disease: Filling the Gap Between Evidence and Practice
Joo Myung Lee1, Joon Hyung Doh2, Chang Wook Nam3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) guide coronary artery disease treatment. This review explores unresolved questions regarding these pressure wire assessments and microvascular dysfunction in patient prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Physiology
Background:
- Myocardial ischemia is a key prognostic factor in coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Ischemia-guided revascularization is a standard of care for CAD patients.
- Pressure wire assessment, including Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), guides revascularization decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent studies addressing unresolved issues in pressure wire assessment for CAD.
- To explore the mechanisms of discordance between resting and hyperemic indices.
- To evaluate the role of physiologic indices and microvascular dysfunction in patient prognosis.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent clinical studies and trials.
- Analysis of data comparing FFR and instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR).
- Investigation into the impact of discordant physiologic index results and microvascular dysfunction.
Main Results:
- FFR-guided revascularization is superior to angiography-guided strategy.
- The hyperemia-free index, iFR, demonstrated non-inferiority to FFR in clinical outcomes.
- Several unresolved issues remain, including index discordance and microvascular dysfunction's role.
Conclusions:
- Pressure wire assessment provides valuable guidance for revascularization in CAD.
- Further research is needed to address discordance between indices and the prognostic role of microvascular dysfunction.
- Optimizing the use of physiologic indices beyond per-vessel decisions is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Abstract:
The presence of myocardial ischemia is the most important prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease, and ischemia-directed revascularization has been a standard of care. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive method used to detect the functionally significant epicardial coronary stenosis, and FFR-guided revascularization strategy has been proven to be superior to angiography-guided strategy. Recently, a hyperemia-free index, instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR), was developed and showed its non-inferiority for clinical outcomes compared with FFR-guided strategy. While evidence supporting the benefit of pressure wire assessment exists, there remain several unresolved issues, such as the mechanism of discordance between resting and hyperemic physiologic indices, clinical outcomes of patient/lesions with discordant results among the physiologic indices, role of physiologic indices beyond per-vessel decision tool, and the role of microvascular dysfunction in patient prognosis. The current article will review the recent studies performed to address these questions.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
10:16Retrograde Perfusion and Filling of Mouse Coronary Vasculature as Preparation for Micro Computed Tomography Imaging
Published on: February 10, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
The Evidence for Evolution