Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing by Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging of Deuterium Incorporation in a Single Bacterium
Published on: February 14, 2022
Accelerate PhenoTestTM BC Kit Versus Conventional Methods for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Amelia K Sofjan1, Benjamin O Casey1, Boxin A Xu1
11 University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Background:
The Accelerate PhenoTestTM BC kit (AXDX) provides rapid organism identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results. Its potential role for antimicrobial stewardship is unknown.
Objective:
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of AXDX with conventional methods (CMs) and assess AXDX's potential role for antimicrobial stewardship in patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSIs).
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included adults with Staphylococcus aureus or Enterococcus spp BSIs from July 2014 to January 2016 at a tertiary care medical center. Available isolates were tested on AXDX, and ID and AST results from AXDX were compared with those from CMs (VITEK 2 or ETEST). The following antibiotics were assessed for categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) between the methods: ampicillin and daptomycin ( Enterococcus spp only), erythromycin and cefoxitin ( S aureus only), linezolid, and vancomycin. Potential role of AXDX for stewardship was assessed via a retrospective audit by infectious diseases clinicians.
Results:
We included 231 patients with S aureus (n = 112) or Enterococcus spp (n = 119) BSIs, and 106 unique isolates were available for ID and AST performance analyses. Sensitivity and specificity of AXDX for ID were 98.0% and 99.5%, respectively. CA and EA for the tested antibiotics were >97%. In Monte Carlo simulations, AXDX coupled with stewardship personnel (either 24/7 or Monday to Friday) would have allowed unnecessary therapy to be stopped and active/targeted therapy to be started ≥24 hours sooner in >50% of patients.
Conclusions:
Compared with CMs, AXDX had similar diagnostic accuracy and can potentially optimize therapy sooner in patients with Gram-positive BSIs.
More Related Videos
11:25Preparation of a Blood Culture Pellet for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Published on: October 15, 2014
12:39Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex for First and Second Line Drugs by Broth Dilution in a Microtiter Plate Format
Published on: June 24, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Antimicrobial Proteins
Interferons
Interferons (IFNs) are proteins produced by lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts infected with viruses. While IFNs cannot prevent viruses from entering and...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Velocity and Position by Integral Method
Consider an example to calculate the velocity and position from the acceleration function. A motorboat is traveling at a constant velocity of 5.0 m/s when it starts to decelerate to arrive at the dock. Its acceleration is...
Methods of Classification and Identification