Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
Published on: March 27, 2012
Quality of Health Care for Children in Australia, 2012-2013
Jeffrey Braithwaite1, Peter D Hibbert1,2,3, Adam Jaffe4,5
1Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
Routine pediatric care quality in Australia was assessed using 479 indicators across 17 common conditions. Adherence averaged 59.8%, indicating potential inadequacies in child healthcare quality.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Healthcare Quality Assessment
- Clinical Practice Guideline Adherence
- Public Health Surveillance
Background:
- Routine care quality for children is seldom evaluated comprehensively.
- Existing assessments often focus on single settings or conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the quality of healthcare for children in Australia.
- To assess adherence to quality indicators in inpatient and ambulatory settings.
Main Methods:
- Multistage stratified sample with medical record review.
- Assessed adherence to 479 quality indicators for 17 common pediatric conditions.
- Evaluated care for 6,689 children across 15,240 visits.
Main Results:
- Overall adherence to quality indicators was 59.8% (95% CI, 57.5%-62.0%).
- Adherence varied significantly by condition, from 43.5% for tonsillitis to 88.8% for autism.
- Mean adherence was 60.5% for noncommunicable, 82.4% for mental health, 56.3% for acute infections, and 78.3% for injury.
Conclusions:
- The overall quality of routine pediatric care in Australia was not high.
- Inadequate quality of care may affect many common childhood conditions.
- Findings highlight the need for improved quality assessment and healthcare delivery for children.
Importance:
The quality of routine care for children is rarely assessed, and then usually in single settings or for single clinical conditions.
Objective:
To estimate the quality of health care for children in Australia in inpatient and ambulatory health care settings.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Multistage stratified sample with medical record review to assess adherence with quality indicators extracted from clinical practice guidelines for 17 common, high-burden clinical conditions (noncommunicable [n = 5], mental health [n = 4], acute infection [n = 7], and injury [n = 1]), such as asthma, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, tonsillitis, and head injury. For these 17 conditions, 479 quality indicators were identified, with the number varying by condition, ranging from 9 for eczema to 54 for head injury. Four hundred medical records were targeted for sampling for each of 15 conditions while 267 records were targeted for anxiety and 133 for depression. Within each selected medical record, all visits for the 17 targeted conditions were identified, and separate quality assessments made for each. Care was evaluated for 6689 children 15 years of age and younger who had 15 240 visits to emergency departments, for inpatient admissions, or to pediatricians and general practitioners in selected urban and rural locations in 3 Australian states. These visits generated 160 202 quality indicator assessments.
Exposures:
Quality indicators were identified through a systematic search of local and international guidelines. Individual indicators were extracted from guidelines and assessed using a 2-stage Delphi process.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Quality of care for each clinical condition and overall.
Results:
Of 6689 children with surveyed medical records, 53.6% were aged 0 to 4 years and 55.5% were male. Adherence to quality of care indicators was estimated at 59.8% (95% CI, 57.5%-62.0%; n = 160 202) across the 17 conditions, ranging from a high of 88.8% (95% CI, 83.0%-93.1%; n = 2638) for autism to a low of 43.5% (95% CI, 36.8%-50.4%; n = 2354) for tonsillitis. The mean adherence by condition category was estimated as 60.5% (95% CI, 57.2%-63.8%; n = 41 265) for noncommunicable conditions (range, 52.8%-75.8%); 82.4% (95% CI, 79.0%-85.5%; n = 14 622) for mental health conditions (range, 71.5%-88.8%); 56.3% (95% CI, 53.2%-59.4%; n = 94 037) for acute infections (range, 43.5%-69.8%); and 78.3% (95% CI, 75.1%-81.2%; n = 10 278) for injury.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Among a sample of children receiving care in Australia in 2012-2013, the overall prevalence of adherence to quality of care indicators for important conditions was not high. For many of these conditions, the quality of care may be inadequate.
Related Concept Videos
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance

