Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of lumbar function.

T G Mayer

    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
    |August 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Conventional low back disability assessments lack visual feedback, relying on subjective reports and inaccurate measures. New technology could improve the objective evaluation of lumbar impairment and disability.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Establishing clinically meaningful severity levels for the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-13).

    European journal of pain (London, England)·2015
    Same author

    Functional restoration for chronic low back pain: Changes in depression, cognitive distortion, and disability.

    Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2013
    Same author

    The functional restoration approach for chronic spinal disability.

    Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2013
    Same author

    Prevalence of psychopathology in acute and chronic low back pain patients.

    Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2013
    Same author

    Changes in psychopathology following functional restoration of chronic low back pain patients: A prospective study.

    Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2013
    Same author

    Recurrent disabling work-related spinal disorders after prior injury claims in a chronic low back pain population.

    The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2003
    Same journal

    Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

    Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
    Same journal

    What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
    Same journal

    CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

    Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
    Same journal

    Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

    Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
    Same journal

    Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

    Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
    Same journal

    Reduced Cerebellar Activation With Eyes Closed Is Associated With Delayed Peroneal Reaction Time in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.

    Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Orthopedics
    • Rehabilitation Medicine
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Conventional low back disability assessments suffer from a lack of objective visual feedback.
    • Current methods rely heavily on subjective patient self-reports and imprecise goniometric mobility measurements.
    • These limitations lead to significant variability in impairment and disability ratings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the inherent problems within current low back disability assessment systems.
    • To explore the potential of new technologies to provide objective measures of physical capacity.
    • To stimulate discussion on future advancements in assessing lumbar impairment and disability.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing literature on low back disability assessment methodologies.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the limitations of subjective reporting and goniometric measures.
  • Exploration of technological advancements applicable to physical capacity assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified critical deficiencies in current low back disability assessment, primarily the absence of objective visual feedback.
    • Highlighted the unreliability of subjective patient self-reports and goniometric measures.
    • Confirmed the wide variance in impairment/disability ratings due to current assessment limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a pressing need for more objective and visually verifiable methods for assessing low back disability.
    • Technological innovations offer promising avenues for improving the accuracy and reliability of impairment and disability ratings.
    • Further research and development in this area are warranted to enhance clinical assessment practices.