Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
Published on: December 4, 2023
Which aortic clamp strategy is better to reduce postoperative stroke and death: Single center report and a
Liyu Chen1, Xiumeng Hua2, Jiangping Song1,2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery.
Insights
Comparing single aortic clamp (SAC) and partial aortic clamp (PAC) strategies for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), this study found no significant difference in 30-day stroke or death rates. However, SAC was associated with reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Anesthesiology
Background:
- Stroke is a significant complication following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Aortic clamping strategies, specifically single aortic clamp (SAC) and partial aortic clamp (PAC), are debated for their impact on postoperative stroke and mortality.
- This study investigates the comparative efficacy of SAC versus PAC in reducing 30-day postoperative stroke and death.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of 30-day postoperative stroke between single aortic clamp (SAC) and partial aortic clamp (PAC) strategies in patients undergoing on-pump CABG.
- To evaluate the 30-day mortality rates associated with SAC versus PAC.
- To determine if one clamping strategy offers superior outcomes regarding stroke and death.
Main Methods:
- A single-center retrospective study of 469 patients undergoing on-pump CABG (SAC group: 265 patients, PAC group: 204 patients).
- A systematic search identified 12 additional studies for meta-analysis.
- Outcomes assessed included 30-day postoperative stroke and mortality, analyzed using fixed-effect modeling with odds ratios (OR).
Main Results:
- Patients in the SAC group were older and had higher rates of peripheral vascular disease and hypertension.
- The SAC group experienced shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times (93.2 ± 22.4 min vs. 103.4 ± 26.8 min).
- Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in 30-day postoperative stroke (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.58-1.06) or mortality (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.10) between SAC and PAC.
Conclusions:
- Neither single aortic clamp (SAC) nor partial aortic clamp (PAC) strategy demonstrated a significant difference in reducing 30-day postoperative stroke or death.
- Single aortic clamp (SAC) is associated with a reduced duration of cardiopulmonary bypass.
- Further research may explore long-term outcomes and specific patient subgroups.
Background:
Stroke is severe complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) which may be associated with clamp strategy, there are 2 strategies to clamp aorta including single aortic clamp (SAC) and partial aortic clamp (PAC). It is controversial that which clamping strategy is better to reduce the postoperative stroke and death, so this study aims to investigate which is better for reducing postoperative stroke and death within 30 days.
Methods:
We collected 469 patients who had on-pump CABG in Fuwai Hospital during January 2014 to July 2015. The SAC group consisted of 265 patients while the PAC group included 204 patients. We compared the 2 group patient difference. At the same time, 12 studies were identified by systematic search. The odds ratio (OR) was used as effect index to compare SAC and PAC strategy by fix-effect modeling. We also tested heterogeneity and publication bias. The primary end point of study was occurrence of postoperative stroke within 30 days of operation, the second end point of study was the incidence of 30-day mortality.
Results:
The single center retrospective study showed that the patients in the SAC group were older than those in the PAC group (62.5 ± 8.1 vs 60.3 ± 8.0 years, P = .01). The proportions of peripheral vascular disease and hypertension of SAC were higher than PAC (71 (26.8%) versus 36 (17.6%), P = .02; 183 (69.1%) versus 115 (56.4%), P = .01, respectively). Besides, the number of vascular anastomosis was more in the SAC group (3.29 ± 0.74 versus 2.97 ± 0.974, P < .001). The linear-regression analysis suggested that the time of cardiopulmonary bypass of SAC was shorter than the PAC group (93.2 ± 22.4 vs.103.4 ± 26.8 minutes, P-regression < .001) and postoperative death within 30-days was similar (1 (0.4%) vs. 2 (1.0%), P-regression = .47). There was no stroke occurring in both the groups. And the meta-analysis suggested the postoperative stroke and death within 30-days were similar between SAC group and PAC group (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.58-1.06; OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.10; respectively). Moreover, subgroup meta-analysis also had the same results.
Conclusion:
There was no significant difference between SAC and PAC clamping strategy on postoperative stroke and death within 30-days; however, SAC can reduce the usage time of cardiopulmonary bypass.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...
Data Reporting and Recording

