Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
Frequency of Instrument, Environment, and Laboratory Technologist Contamination during Routine Diagnostic Testing of
Melanie L Yarbrough1, Jennie H Kwon2, Meghan A Wallace1
1Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abstract:
Laboratory testing to support the care of patients with highly infectious diseases may pose a risk for laboratory workers. However, data on the risk of virus transmission during routine laboratory testing conducted using standard personal protective equipment (PPE) are sparse. Our objective was to measure laboratory contamination during routine analysis of patient specimens. Remnant specimens were spiked with the nonpathogenic bacteriophage MS2 at 1.0 × 107 PFU/ml, and contamination was assessed using reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) for MS2. Specimen containers were exteriorly coated with a fluorescent powder to enable the visualization of gross contamination using UV light. Testing was performed by two experienced laboratory technologists using standard laboratory PPE and sample-to-answer instrumentation. Fluorescence was noted on the gloves, bare hands, and laboratory coat cuffs of the laboratory technologist in 36/36 (100%), 13/36 (36%), and 4/36 (11%) tests performed, respectively. Fluorescence was observed in the biosafety cabinet (BSC) in 8/36 (22%) tests, on test cartridges/devices in 14/32 (44%) tests, and on testing accessory items in 29/32 (91%) tests. Fluorescence was not observed on or in laboratory instrumentation or adjacent surfaces. In contrast to fluorescence detection, MS2 detection was infrequent (3/286 instances [1%]) and occurred during test setup for the FilmArray instrument and on FilmArray accessory equipment. The information from this study may provide opportunities for the improvement of clinical laboratory safety practices so as to reduce the risk of pathogen transmission to laboratory workers.
Insights
Routine laboratory testing poses risks to workers. This study found significant surface contamination, even with personal protective equipment (PPE), highlighting needs for improved clinical laboratory safety practices to reduce pathogen transmission.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Laboratory Science
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Infectious Disease Control
Background:
- Laboratory testing for infectious diseases presents risks to healthcare workers.
- Limited data exist on virus transmission risks during routine testing with standard personal protective equipment (PPE).
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify laboratory contamination during routine analysis of patient specimens.
- To assess the effectiveness of standard PPE in preventing contamination during high-risk testing.
Main Methods:
- Nonpathogenic bacteriophage MS2 was used to simulate virus contamination in patient specimens.
- Fluorescent powder and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) detected contamination on surfaces and equipment.
- Testing was conducted by experienced technologists using standard PPE and automated instrumentation.
Main Results:
- 100% of tests showed fluorescent contamination on gloves, 36% on hands, and 11% on lab coat cuffs.
- Contamination was found on test cartridges (44%) and accessories (91%), but not on instrumentation.
- Actual MS2 detection via RT-PCR was infrequent (1%), primarily during test setup.
Conclusions:
- Standard PPE and current practices may not fully prevent surface contamination in clinical laboratories.
- Visible contamination highlights potential risks for laboratory workers handling infectious agents.
- Findings suggest opportunities to enhance clinical laboratory safety protocols to minimize pathogen transmission.
More Related Videos
05:49Tracking Microbial Contamination in Retail Environments Using Fluorescent Powder - A Retail Delicatessen Environment Example
Published on: March 5, 2014
06:44Author Spotlight: Developing Identification Methods for Rhodiola crenulata and Investigating Its Resource Distribution and Pharmacological Effects
Published on: October 27, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests