Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
Published on: May 4, 2020
Lose-Shift Responding in Humans Is Promoted by Increased Cognitive Load
Victorita E Ivan1, Parker J Banks1, Kris Goodfellow1
1Canadian Centre for Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Lose-shift responding, a strategy of changing choices after poor outcomes, is a default brain behavior. Executive functions normally suppress this, but cognitive load or developmental stage can increase its prevalence.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Economics
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Animals often switch choices after negative outcomes, a behavior termed 'lose-shift'.
- The underlying memory mechanisms supporting this strategy in humans are not fully understood.
- Executive functions are crucial for adaptive decision-making and suppressing impulsive behaviors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of memory and executive control in human lose-shift responding.
- To determine if cognitive load or developmental stage influences the prevalence of lose-shift behavior.
- To explore lose-shift responding as a potential behavioral assay for executive function.
Main Methods:
- A binary choice task was employed where random responding was optimal.
- Cognitive load was manipulated in adults by adding a secondary task.
- Lose-shift responding was compared between adults under normal and high cognitive load, and across different age groups of children (5-9 and 11-13 years old).
Main Results:
- Adults under high cognitive load exhibited a 30-40% increase in lose-shift responding compared to those with normal load.
- Lose-shift responding persisted in cognitively loaded adults, decreasing only with increased time between reinforcement and choice.
- Children aged 5-9 years showed similar lose-shift rates to cognitively loaded adults, an effect absent in older children (11-13 years).
Conclusions:
- Lose-shift responding appears to be a default, reflexive mammalian strategy, possibly driven by a decaying memory trace.
- Executive systems normally suppress lose-shift behavior, but this suppression is reduced by cognitive load or developmental immaturity.
- Lose-shift responding can serve as a sensitive, objective measure of executive function in humans.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region
Increasing Function
Increased Body Temperature
Increased pulse rate
Many factors can elevate the risk of developing tachycardia. These include advanced age, a family history of arrhythmias, and an...
Language and Cognition

