Predictive factors of recurrent endovascular intervention for cephalic arch stenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Marta Neves1, Cristina Outerelo2, Marta Pereira2
1Lisbon Vascular Access Center, NephroCare Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.
Insights
Diabetes and residual stenosis predict cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) recurrence in hemodialysis patients. Isolated lesions may be protective, guiding future interventions for vascular access patency.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) frequently recurs in hemodialysis patients, necessitating repeat interventions to maintain vascular access patency.
- Understanding predictive factors for CAS recurrence is crucial for optimizing patient management and treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify independent predictive factors for the recurrence of cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) following successful angioplasty in hemodialysis patients.
- To analyze variables associated with recurrent CAS to improve clinical decision-making.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective case-control study involving 375 endovascular interventions for CAS across two vascular access centers.
- Patients were categorized based on the recurrence of CAS within 180 days of a previous successful angioplasty.
- Multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses were employed to determine predictive factors and patency rates.
Main Results:
- The recurrence rate of CAS was 25%.
- Diabetes (HR, 2.054) and residual stenosis <30% (HR, 1.86) were significant predictors of CAS recurrence.
- Isolated CAS lesions showed a negative association with recurrence (HR, 0.445), suggesting a protective effect.
Conclusions:
- Diabetes and residual stenosis are key predictors of CAS recurrence after angioplasty.
- The presence of isolated CAS lesions appears to be protective against recurrence.
- These findings can inform strategies to improve long-term vascular access patency in hemodialysis patients.
Objective:
Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) is an important and recurring problem arising in hemodialysis patients because of the requirement for repeated interventions to maintain patency. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for recurrence of CAS after successful angioplasty.
Methods:
A retrospective, case-control study was conducted at two ambulatory vascular access (VA) centers. All patients with a dysfunctional VA referred for an angiographic procedure and with a documented CAS as evidenced during the endovascular intervention (EI) between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, were enrolled; 15 patients in whom an efficacious intervention was not possible were excluded. The study thus concerned 375 EIs using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty without stent placement on 241 VAs for CAS (9% of all procedures performed) during a 3-year period. Patients were compared regarding the absence (group 1; n = 181) or presence (group 2; n = 60) of recurrent CAS. We defined recurrence as that which occurred within 180 days of the previous successful EI for CAS. Any CAS diagnosed and treated >180 days after a previous one was considered a novel CAS and not a recurrence. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine variables independently associated with recurrence of CAS. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for determination of primary and assisted primary patency in this population.
Results:
The recurrence rate of CAS was high (25%). Patients in both groups had similar demographic characteristics, time on hemodialysis, and mean dialysis dose and access flow rate at referral (P > .05). Multivariate analysis provided a significant discriminatory influence pertaining to diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 2.054; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-3.46; P = .007), residual stenosis even though it was <30% (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.005-3.439; P = .048), and the finding of an isolated CAS lesion (HR, 0.445; 95% CI, 0.219-0.905; P = .025) in comparing group 1 and group 2. All other variables lost statistical significance on multivariate analysis. Primary patency at 6 months was 72%, increasing to an assisted primary patency of 89% at 6 months. The median durations of primary patency and assisted primary patency were 9.5 months and 15.6 months, respectively.
Conclusions:
Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes and residual stenosis (albeit <30%) were predictive of recurrence, whereas the finding of an isolated CAS lesion as opposed to stenoses in multiple locations was shown to be negatively associated with recurrent CAS, appearing to be "protective".
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
05:17Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Arch of Aorta
Encircling the heart, the coronary arteries form a ring-like structure before...
Cephalic Phase of Digestion
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction