Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
First-trimester and combined first- and second-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal
A Sotiriadis1, F Figueras2, M Eleftheriades3
1Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Objective:
To develop a first-trimester or combined first- and second-trimester screening algorithm for the prediction of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and late fetal growth restriction (FGR).
Methods:
This was a retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancy, who underwent routine first-, second- and third-trimester ultrasound assessment. Late FGR was defined, at ≥ 32 weeks' gestation in the absence of congenital anomalies, as either (i) estimated fetal weight (EFW) or birth weight (BW) < 3rd centile, or (ii) EFW < 10th centile and either uterine artery mean pulsatility index (UtA-PI) > 95th centile or cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 5th centile. Neonates with BW < 10th centile, regardless of prenatal parameters, were defined as SGA. The predictive effectiveness of maternal and first- and second-trimester factors was tested using logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses.
Results:
A total of 3520 fetuses were included (late FGR, n = 109 (3.1%); SGA, n = 292 (8.3%)). Of the late FGR cases, 56 (1.6%) fulfilled the antenatal criteria (EFW < 3rd centile or EFW < 10th centile plus abnormal UtA-PI or CPR) and were defined as prenatally detected late FGR. A first-trimester screening model (comprising conception method, smoking status, maternal height, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and UtA-PI) could predict 50.0% of the prenatally diagnosed and 36.7% of the overall late FGR fetuses for a 10% false-positive rate (FPR). A model combining first- and second-trimester screening parameters (conception method, smoking status, PAPP-A, second- trimester EFW, head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio and UtA-PI) could predict 78.6% of the prenatally detected, and 59.6% of the overall late FGR fetuses, for a 10% FPR (area under the curve 0.901 (95% CI, 0.856-0.947) and 0.855 (95% CI, 0.818-0.891), respectively). The prediction of SGA was suboptimal for both first-trimester and combined screening.
Conclusions:
A simple model combining maternal and first- and second-trimester predictors can detect 60% of fetuses that will develop late FGR, and 79% of those fetuses that will be classified prenatally as late FGR, for a 10% FPR. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
More Related Videos
15:27Construction of Vapor Chambers Used to Expose Mice to Alcohol During the Equivalent of all Three Trimesters of Human Development
Published on: July 13, 2014
09:57In Vitro Assays to Evaluate the Migration, Invasion, and Proliferation of Immortalized Human First-trimester Trophoblast Cell Lines
Published on: March 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Restriction Enzymes
The host bacteria protect their own genomic DNA from these enzymes by methylating these sites. Some...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Fetal Circulation
Two umbilical arteries transport blood from the fetus to the placenta. At the placenta, the blood absorbs oxygen and nutrients while simultaneously eliminating waste products. This oxygen-enriched and nutrient-rich blood then returns to the fetus through one...
Aging
Cellular Clock Theory
The cellular clock theory posits that the human lifespan is closely tied to the finite capacity of cells to divide, a phenomenon governed by telomeres, which are protective caps at the ends of...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.