Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.6K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.3K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

1.1K
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
1.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors affecting Union Rates following Fixation of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knees: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The journal of knee surgery·2026
Same author

Reliability and clinical utility of paediatric ankle fracture classifications : a systematic review.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Outcomes of surgical fixation of osteochondral fracture: a systematic review.

Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology·2026
Same author

Does Vitamin D Concentration Matter? The Consequential Effects of Serum Vitamin D Concentration and Supplementation on Paediatric Fracture Risk.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroereisis and osteotomy in the treatment of paediatric patients with idiopathic flexible pes planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2026
Same author

Is there a need for exploration in pulseless supracondylar fractures of the humerus? A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Establishing a Diaphyseal Femur Fracture Model in Mice
05:46

Establishing a Diaphyseal Femur Fracture Model in Mice

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.1K

Paediatric lateral condyle fractures: a systematic review.

Si Heng Sharon Tan1, Jo Dartnell2, Andrew Kean Seng Lim2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Orthopaedic, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Cluster, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119074, Singapore. sharon_sh_tan@nuhs.edu.sg.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
|March 26, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Paediatric lateral condyle humerus fractures are common. Conservative management is recommended for non-displaced fractures, while displaced fractures (>2mm) require surgery, with close follow-up crucial for optimal outcomes.

Keywords:
ComplicationsLateral condyle fracturePaediatricRisk factorsSystematic review

More Related Videos

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.9K
Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Establishing a Diaphyseal Femur Fracture Model in Mice
05:46

Establishing a Diaphyseal Femur Fracture Model in Mice

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.1K
A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.9K
Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Traumatology

Background:

  • Lateral condyle humerus fractures are frequent in children.
  • Limited consensus exists regarding their complications, management, and epidemiology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the literature on paediatric lateral condyle humerus fractures.
  • To elucidate complication risks, management strategies, and epidemiological data.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
  • Inclusion of all studies involving paediatric lateral condyle humerus fractures.
  • Analysis of data from 2440 children.

Main Results:

  • High union rates observed; low incidences of delayed union (0.9%), non-union (1.6%), and malunion (1.5%).
  • Common complications include prominent lateral condyle (27.3%), extension loss (11.5%), and neurological deficits (10.6%).
  • Risk factors for complications identified: concomitant fractures, specific classifications, displacement, fixation methods, and diagnostic/management errors.

Conclusions:

  • Non-displaced fractures: conservative management.
  • Displaced fractures (>2mm): surgical intervention.
  • Minimally displaced fractures: conservative treatment with vigilant follow-up for displacement detection.
  • Radiographic follow-up at 1 week recommended; serial radiographs lack clinical significance.
  • Kirschner wires or lag screws are viable fixation options; wires should be exposed and removed post-consolidation (approx. 6 weeks).
  • Close monitoring is essential for these fractures.