Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodology in clinical back pain trials.

R Bloch

    Spine
    |June 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary

    Evaluating low-back pain therapies requires critical appraisal. Many studies suffer from bias, with few high-quality randomized controlled trials and cohort studies found in recent publications.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    In-situ formation of glyphosate and AMPA in activated sludge from phosphonates used as antiscalants and bleach stabilizers in households and industry.

    Water research·2025
    Same author

    Prevalence, diversity, and interaction patterns of avian haemosporidians in a four-year study of blackcaps in a migratory divide.

    Parasitology·2011
    Same author

    Irreversible differentiation in certain plant cell lineages.

    The Biological bulletin·2010
    Same author

    Fabrication and evaluation of membranes as specific electrodes for calcium ions.

    Biophysical journal·2009
    Same author

    Impact of activating killer immunoglobulin-like receptor genotype on outcome of unrelated donor-hematopoietic cell transplantation.

    Transplantation proceedings·2006
    Same author

    Antimicrobial activity of Polyscias filicifolia cell biomass extracts.

    Die Pharmazie·2002

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical research methodology
    • Pain management studies

    Background:

    • Assessing the efficacy of low-back pain therapies is crucial for evidence-based practice.
    • Numerous studies investigating low-back pain treatments may contain methodological flaws.
    • Identifying reliable evidence requires rigorous critical appraisal of research design and execution.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To establish clear criteria for critically evaluating research on low-back pain therapy efficacy.
    • To identify common sources of bias and statistical noise in such investigations.
    • To assess the quality of published research in this field based on defined criteria.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a checklist for critical appraisal of low-back pain therapy studies.
    • Systematic review of recent publications in a specific journal.
    • Categorization of studies based on methodological rigor (e.g., randomized controlled trials, cohort studies).

    Main Results:

    • Out of 147 reviewed reports, only a small fraction met the criteria for high-quality research.
    • Specifically, only two valid randomized controlled trials were identified.
    • Four properly controlled cohort studies were also found, highlighting a scarcity of robust evidence.

    Conclusions:

    • The critical appraisal criteria effectively identified limitations in existing low-back pain research.
    • A significant proportion of published studies on low-back pain therapies lack sufficient methodological rigor.
    • Further emphasis on robust study design and unbiased reporting is needed to advance the field.

    Related Experiment Videos