Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
Published on: December 31, 2013
Saving Lives and Preventing Injuries From Unjustified Protective Actions-Method for Developing a Comprehensive Public
Evacuation during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant emergency caused deaths unrelated to radiation. Protective action strategies must balance radiological and non-radiological health impacts for better decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear safety
- Public health
- Risk assessment
Background:
- Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (FDNPP) emergency response led to patient deaths during evacuation due to lack of medical support.
- Increased mortality rates observed in the elderly due to long-term dislocation and inability to shelter during the FDNPP emergency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the non-radiological health impacts of protective actions during nuclear emergencies.
- To propose a method for developing comprehensive protective action strategies that balance radiological and non-radiological hazards.
- To address the exaggerated fear of radiation exposure and its consequences.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of health impacts during the FDNPP emergency response.
- Review of recommendations from International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Main Results:
- Protective actions taken during the FDNPP emergency resulted in deaths and adverse health effects, despite low radiation exposure levels.
- Current recommendations from regulatory bodies inadequately consider non-radiological health impacts of protective actions.
- Lack of clear dose-response information for radiation effects hinders the balancing of risks.
Conclusions:
- A comprehensive protective action strategy is needed to balance radiological and non-radiological health hazards.
- Decision-making processes must account for both radiation risks and the adverse effects of protective measures.
- Mitigating exaggerated fear of radiation is crucial to prevent unjustified protective actions and their negative consequences.
More Related Videos
06:34New Application of an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet as a Neuro-protective Agent Against Glucose Deprivation-induced Injury of SH-SY5Y Cells
Published on: October 9, 2017
10:53Preparation of Acute Brain Slices Using an Optimized N-Methyl-D-glucamine Protective Recovery Method
Published on: February 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Fixed Action Patterns
Protection of Alcohols
Protection
It defines a protecting group as the masking agent to make the more reactive species inert to a given set of conditions. This concept is depicted via the illustration of liquid flow through different outlets in an assembly of pipes. The analogy helps to understand the role...
Zones of Protection
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...
Protecting Self-Esteem
Radial System Protection
In a radial system with a fault downstream of the third breaker, ideally, only the third breaker will open, isolating the fault and interrupting the load connected beyond it. The second breaker has a longer delay setting,...
Action Potentials